giova...@paclan.it writes:
> On 11/7/23 18:38, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>>>> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html sa
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>>https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
>>>>-L learn type
>>>>Send message to spamd for learning. The lear
"George A. Theall via users" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
>>-L learn type
>>Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be
>&
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
-L learn type
Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be
either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
to 5 if the message was learned, or 6 if it was already
learned.
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> The update is done by sa-update. I use only a script around it, but
> the script calls sa-update.
>
> From now on this script is not run as root anymore, but as
> debian-spamd.
>
> I also tried to do this with the service, but that gave a lot
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>>> Debian 12 contains SpamAssassion 4.0.0-6.
>
>>Cecil Westerhof writes:
>>> Strange. When running 'apt update' I get:
>>> All packages are up to date.
>
> On 05.11.23 13:54, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>It
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>
>>>> What platform are you running on? (OS, distro, perl version, etc.)
>>>
>>>Debian 12.
>>>sa-update version 4.0.0 / svn1900642
>>> running on Perl version 5.36.0
>>
&g
t; gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>> '/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
>> The directory itself has drwx--, what seems OK to me.
>> Or is it about /etc/spamassassin? This has drwxr-xr-x.
>
> OWNERSHIP is *not* permissions
I was a bit confuse
ages or using other way?
I really do not know for sure. I thought default packages, but it is
to long ago.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote on 2/11/23 4:02 am:
>> And when I run that from the command line I get:
>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>> '/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
>
> That is referring to the owner of the di
Bill Cole writes:
> On 2023-11-01 at 07:50:38 UTC-0400 (Wed, 01 Nov 2023 12:50:38 +0100)
> Cecil Westerhof
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Since some time I see that when I want to update the spamassassin
>> filters I get error 74 for every email that I use to train th
Since some time I see that when I want to update the spamassassin
filters I get error 74 for every email that I use to train the
filters. What could be happening here?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
h a few about
2020.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:28 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> Why did my replies disappear then? I am not banned, because then the
> one you responded on would not have appeared either.
>
> Not enough information for me to know but I c
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:28 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> Why did my replies disappear then? I am not banned, because then the
> one you responded on would not have appeared either.
>
> Not enough information for me to know but I c
se.
I do not, but if blatant inaccuracies are spit out I sometimes
respond.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
cuse the 'extreme right' people
of is just looking into the mirror did not appear.
What I find strange, because in my -of-course biased opinion- where a
lot less shocking as published versions on both sides of the spectrum.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Mark London writes:
> Spamassassin is not alone.
And that is how dictatorships and injustices are created: blindly
following, because a lot of others do.
Hitler, Mussolini and Franco where the worst.
Luckily we also had the saviours, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Sen
>> something to mark it as YOURS. Isn't that rather selfish?
>> {^_^}
>
> The intent is to be fully backwards-compatible, so it's (hopefully)
> *not* going to be that bad.
The word hopefully makes me feel very secure.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
es, reasonable descriptive. While the original is very clear. So in
my opinion a very stupid move.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
ve to certain people. This can be changed
without dire consequences.
Black Lives Matter.
White Lives Don't Matter.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8460059/Cambridge-University-backs-academic-tweeted-White-Lives-Dont-Matter.html
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
he issue want to avoid adding more noise to a list
> that's about SpamAssassin. Maybe a lot of people recognized this
> wasn't a "motion" or a request for comment at all, but rather notice
> of a change to code. Or, as you yourself mention, maybe a lot of
> people ar
he gender terms.
To be honest, I think the gender terms have a better case to be
changed as blacklist and whitelist.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
t?
And what about master degrees?
And whitewashing, black eye, black Friday, black market, …?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 28.03.20 um 08:09 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
>> When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
>> 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
>> blocklist
>>
DBL
blocklist
[URIs: techwrestle.com]
Should not one of those two be removed, because it is now penalised
two times.
It was spam, so that is not the problem, it only looks wrong to me.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn
file is overwritten.
I do not see a reason to override it. But I am going to ask why it is
there three times.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
stituted --allow-tell for $OPTIONS and restarted the service. Now
>> it works again. But why the service file has been changed …
>
> That would be an issue for whoever packages SA for your system. There is
> no systemd service file distributed in the SA release.
It is a Debian
Bowie Bailey writes:
> On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>>
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
>> localh
"Bill Cole" writes:
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
>> (EX_IOERR: IO error).
>
> This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
> spamd.
>
&g
] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
Update finished, no fresh updates were available
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
s case.
It is almost solved. Sometimes it even gets into spam, but I am just
curious. And maybe it can help to make SpamAssassin better.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
On Tuesday 4 Jul 2017 10:33 CEST, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.07.2017 um 10:07 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
>> When looking in my logs, I saw: spamd[1172]: error creating a DNS
>> resolver socket: Address family for hostname not supported at
>> /usr/share/per spamd[11
solved my
problem. What could be the reason of mu problem? And is my change the
correct one?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
On Sunday 28 May 2017 14:50 CEST, Joe Quinn wrote:
> On 5/28/2017 2:11 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> When executing:
>> spamc -L spam >
>> I get an EX_IOERR error. But no description why I get it. Is there
>> a way to find out what triggers the error?
>>
>
When executing:
spamc -L spam http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Op Wednesday 1 Jan 2014 05:19 CET schreef Michael Seepe:
> Happy new Year to you all and may all your wishes come true :-)
To you and the rest:
May you not get what you wish,
but what you need.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com
Op woensdag 26 dec 2012 23:12 CET schreef Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 12/26/2012 3:54 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op woensdag 26 dec 2012 21:22 CET schreef Kevin A. McGrail:
>>
>>> These errors relate to the fact that those rules are encapsulated
>>> with a versio
3.4+
if (version >= 3.004000)
While the latest version (which I am running) is:
3.3.2
So why wants mailspike 3.4+?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
if (version >= 3.004000)
While the latest version (which I am running) is:
3.3.2
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
he version I am running.
Is something else missing?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
non-existent rule URIBL_SBL_A
Dec 26 03:04:13.120 [17074] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3
So it looks to me that rules that are not used anymore are deleted,
but there scoring not.
Should the scorings not be deleted also?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 19:22 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>> HS_INDEX_PARAM: tell them not to use web bugs in their marketing
>> emails
>
> Could you be more specific. If I tell them this they will not know
> what to do.
I did not understand the real meaning
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 13:23 CEST schreef Michael Scheidell:
> On 6/9/12 5:55 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> The following tree messages I see a lot in false positives:
>> 1.2 HS_INDEX_PARAM URI: Link contains a common tracker pattern.
>> 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: H
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:15 CEST schreef Benny Pedersen:
> Den 2012-06-09 11:55, Cecil Westerhof skrev:
>> The following tree messages I see a lot in false positives:
>> 1.2 HS_INDEX_PARAM URI: Link contains a common tracker
>> pattern.
>> 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:24 CEST schreef hamann w.:
> BTW: the OP is in a quite lucky situation: he knows that the system
> uses SA
I installed it myself. ;-}
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:01 CEST schreef RW:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:52:58 +0200
> Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> A few of the mails on this group came in my spam folder because of:
>> 2.9 SPOOF_COM2OTH URI: URI contains ".com" in middle
>> 2.0 SPOO
dynamic-looking rDNS
I am an user, not a spam expert. What does this mean and what could I
tell the sender to have there email not ending in my spam folder?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
is already triggered.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Matt Kettler writes:
> On 4/4/2010 12:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> When running sa-update with -D I see when there are updates the folowing
>> lines:
>> Apr 4 18:26:15.954 [12630] dbg: config: warning: score set for
>> non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
>&g
rror"
;;
*)
echo "Error while trying to download SpamAssasin rules"
;;
esac
echo
grep "${GREP_REGEX}" ${LOG_FILE}
Off course I have in my inittab:
spam:2345:respawn:/usr/bin/spamd --allow-tell
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
happening here?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Mark Martinec writes:
> On Friday 02 April 2010 15:31:39 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> > According to that Apache wikipage
>> > Net::Ident is required by SA.
>
> Net::Ident is NOT required by SA, it is entirely optional
> (unless you want to use --auth-ident option to
Jari Fredriksson writes:
> On 2.4.2010 14:31, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Jari Fredriksson writes:
>>
>>> On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
>>>>
>>>
>&g
Jari Fredriksson writes:
> On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
>>
>
> I might try "force install Net::Ident" and then prepare to format my HD :(
It looks like it does not pose a problem. Is it an im
I use the option -D to get the debug information from the sa commands.
Most is not interesting, so I filter it with:
grep 'not installed\|warning'
Does this get everything, or should I expand the regex?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linke
Most of my problems where solved by installing db-dev abd running
'install Bundle::CPAN'. But some problems remain.
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> Also with the script I use to run sa-update I created a log file. When I
> do:
> grep 'not installed\|warning' sa-update
Cecil Westerhof writes:
>> In CPAN, you might want to try at least
>>
>>install Bundle::CPAN
>
> I'll do this. Will properly take some time, because it is quit an old
> system.
>
>
>> and if that does not install YAML and LWPm then
>>
&
nt on CPAN on all your Perl
> stuff. I have been there, done that. Now trying to stick with distro
> Perl, and upgrade distro, if Perl gets old.
I will make sure this will be done.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
this command:
JPC/Net-Ident-1.20.tar.gz: make_test NO
What is happening here?
And what about the warnings avout 'score set for non-existent rule', is
this something to worry about?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
o folder. In my situation not
very important, but I like to do things in the 'correct' way. When
someone is going to use my script on a server where there is a lot to
learn and regularly, then the current script would be a lot better as
the old script.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Softwar
message size is 256 MB.
>
>The size is specified in bytes, as a positive integer greater
>than 0. For example, -s 50.
>
> I'd suggest doing a size test and explicitly telling spamc to use the
> same size limit.
That is the safest. ;-) Only prob
pt
did not work. How do I found out what the size limit is? And I still
need the check, because when the size limit changes (or the wrong one is
used) you will get the error.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
In the thread:
http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-closed/2009-08/msg01318.html
Error code 98 is described as the message being fed being to big and the
problem resolved. But it is not.
I have a big message:
-rw-r--r-- 1 imaps users 1,4M 2010-01-11 18:05
1263235863.M361818P11014V000
ut can get in
> the way with higher volumes.
With the changed code it only takes a few seconds, so properly I do not
have to worry about this.
Also, the learning is already done in a cronjob at the time I am in
principle not working on the computer.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
way this is good: I do not need to work with 'set +e' and 'set -e'
and I can catch the output to decide what has happened.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> The documentation says:
> -L learn type, --learntype=type
>Send message to spamd for learning. The "learn type" can be
> either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
>to 5 if the message wa
Note that the "spamd" must run with the "--allow-tell" option for
this to work.
But when I run spamc -L I get a return code 0 back. I am working with:
SpamAssassin Client version 3.2.5
Also is it possible to do not have output? At hte moment I get:
(Message was
9538 0 non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000 0 1263044805 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 05529600 0 non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000 0 1868 0 non-token data: last expire
re
LuKreme writes:
> I think he (she?)
He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil
B. DeMill.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with
> permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
> /dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something
> like this happens again I now can rec
ramete...@]}"; do
read echoStr typeStr dirStr < <(echo "${temp}")
date
echo ${echoStr}
sa-learn --${typeStr} ${HOME}/Maildir/.SpamDir.${dirStr}/cur/
echo
done
date
sa-learn --dump magic
date
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
t problem with
permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
/dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something
like this happens again I now can recover those e-mails.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
of when going from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5? And how
important is this? Until now there is not a real problem with the
filtering.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
75 matches
Mail list logo
