giova...@paclan.it writes: > On 11/7/23 18:38, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> writes: >> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >>>>>> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says: >>>>>> -L learn type >>>>>> Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be >>>>>> either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set >>>>>> to 5 if the message was learned, or 6 if it was already >>>>>> learned. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that the spamd must run with the --allow-tell option for >>>>>> this to work. >>> >>>> "George A. Theall via users" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> writes: >>>>> How are you running spamd? With -l / --allow-tell? >>> >>> On 07.11.23 15:01, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >>>> --pidfile=/run/spamd.pid --username=imaps --allow-tell >>>> --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir >>>> >>>> And the learning does work. But I have to use the generated text >>>> instead of the exit codes. >>> >>> I'm afraid that for --allow-tell and --username=imaps you need all >>> mailboxes to be writable under "imaps" user, e.g. virtual users or >>> similar. >> They are imaps -> imap over ssh. >> But that is not the problem. Spamc does what it should be doing, >> except that it gives back 0 instead of 5 or 6. >> > It seems to be a documentation bug, see > https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6069 and > https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=1201#c47
I understand, but do not agree. Long ago this was the case, but a lot of programs give a non zero return code back without it being an error. Even sa-update: here 1 means that there were no updates. I do not see that as an error. I hope I do not have to change my script in the near future because sa-update is going to return zero when there are no updates. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
