John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Mynabbler wrote:
We experience quite a bit of spam with subjects like:
- SexyCoedHoneysGetWildInTheseRealgfsPhotos
- Make*each*of*your*intimate*acts*unforgettable*for*your*partner
- HotGi'rlP,us'syF,u'c.kedByPigs
-
We-are-the-only-manufacturer-who-of
Kris Deugau wrote:
I'd say it's *probably* legit.
Very probably.
Responsys IPs, with their customer clearly indicated in the PTRs
12.130.139.51 om-paypal-apac.rsys4.com.
12.130.139.52 om-paypal-eu1.rsys4.com.
12.130.139.53 om-paypal-na.rsys4.com.
12.130.139.54 om-paypal-eu2.rsys4.com.
I
Martin Gregorie wrote:
However, there is one fairly straight forward question that can be
easily answered: has anybody ever seen an all-number mailbox/user id in
circumstances where it *isn't* a phone number?
Yes. I have seen personal addresses with all-digit LHS.
It's almost always been "
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I could even say "Block my domain " but what is IF one
of my employees want to use LinedIn, Facebook or Twitter?
This is exactly what I'm asking for.
If my users choose to sign up, fine, let them use it and then
/those/ addresses can receive invitations, or any cra
Chris Richman wrote:
Hi, Michelle. I've added those domains to our suppression list so they
shouldn't receive email from us anymore. I wasn't able to add gnome.org
because we have several users with confirmed gnome.org email addresses.
I would like to recommend that you find a way to segre
Noel Butler wrote:
He has a point though, and why is it when people don't agree with
someone the troll label comes out, FFS get over your selves. People
always only half read, and then go half cocked, its called life, get
used to it.
In this case the "troll" label is more of an understatem
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 01/02/2010 17:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
Yep - sutterhealth.org is a hospital. Making sure good email gets
through is more important than a little bit of occasional spam.
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists
"And if you never send spam we want
jdow wrote:
Guys, spam here kicked up 100% very recently, about the time I
tweaked "Richard". And it bears a Leo Kuvayev sort of stamp to
it - porn, pharmaceuticals, etc.
Watching spam patterns can be very interesting.
Thinking that you know what one single stand-out data point means
is al
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>In-Reply-To: <4b226758.90...@perkel.com>
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
Kai
All the noise aside,
the message referenced by your threading header,
/at least when it arrived here/,
DID in fact contain a text-part
which appears to i
Charles Gregory wrote:
I ask again, on the issue of whitelists, is there a serious issue with
spammers targetting white-listed IP's as favored candidates for hacking?
I'm okay with the answer being 'no'. I'm sure people with large servers
and good statistics could answer this question. But I get
Mike Cardwell wrote:
So you don't have to register a domain before you can register your IPs...
Which is it? Do I have to register a domain, or don't I? So I signed up
for an account and all I see is an option to register my domains with
them, and that costs money... I see no option for regist
Michael Scheidell wrote:
But... you draw your own conclusions. the best thing about a
conspiracy theory is that there is little proof. if this is little
proof, then this would make a good conspiracy theory.
YMMV.
I have more evidence for you:
Barracuda Networks uses the emailreg.or
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
postfix reject_unverified_sender does a vrfy
Nope. It opens an SMTP connection and waits what the receiving MTA
answers to "RCPT TO"
Then it closes the connection.
That is not vrfy.
Hope this helps,
wolfgang
The VRFY mechanism
Michael Hutchinson [mailto:mhutchin...@manux.co.nz] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charles Gregory [mailto:cgreg...@hwcn.org]
> > Good users all. Never heard of a troll?
> > Nonsensical. Irritating. Taunting.
> >
> > Best defense against this kind of childish antic is to IGNO
No - that really came out of mail2.kraftfoods.com (parent corporation of
Gevalia, remember?)
I have seen other samples of the same message spamming other recipients, and
there's no question of source IP.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: MySQL Student [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.co
Actually, Richard, yes - I have management approval for what details I choose
to share with any given online community. I am also learning to count Jann
among my friends, and I'm sure he would *appropriately* acknowledge your
greeting.
If your participation is at all typical of this community,
eil Schwartzman [mailto:neil.schwartz...@returnpath.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 11:58 AM
To: Bob O'Brien; Spamassassin
Subject: Re: Barracuda Blacklist
On 29/05/09 4:09 PM, "Bob O'Brien" wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Based on our "Requests for Removal" filed over the p
Neil,
Based on our "Requests for Removal" filed over the past 3+ weeks from
ReturnPath, the number of IPs that you are claiming to have had issues with
appears inflated by a factor of nearly 50%.
More importantly, I feel it is irresponsible to oversimplify a cleared listing
as a "false positiv
thread here about emailreg, I will attend.
But can we please redirect this thread back to the original _blacklist_
question?
Bob "O`Bob" O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Rob McEwen [mailto:r...@invaluement.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:10 AM
To: users@spa
19 matches
Mail list logo
