Re: SA Upgrade from 3.1.8 -> 3.2.1 via CPAN fails

2007-06-22 Thread Anthony Edwards
you read the bug history, shown now as Status: RESOLVED, Resolution: FIXED. However, a CPAN installation attempted a few moments ago failed as per the original bug report. Presumably, Justin's committed patch of 18 Jun 2007 hasn't yet made its way to the CPAN servers? -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem installing SA 3.2.0 via CPAN on OPenSuSE 10.2 or SLES 10

2007-05-27 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Anthony Edwards schrieb: > > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Stephen Carter wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I've

Re: Problem installing SA 3.2.0 via CPAN on OPenSuSE 10.2 or SLES 10

2007-05-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
Not found: status = X-Spam-Status: Yes, score= > # Failed test 9 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #8 > Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_z/out.1 > t/spamc_z...FAILED tests 2-9 > Failed 8/9 tests, 11.11% okay Same result here, attempting to update via cpan on Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Perl incompatibility causes spamc/spamd to fail

2005-06-21 Thread Anthony Edwards
fact, explained at: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/56501 If you edit /etc/init.d/spamd to change the line: SPAMD_BIN=/usr/sbin/spamd To read: SPAMD_BIN=/usr/bin/spamd Then stop and restart spamd and use the YaST Runlevel Editor to configure spamd to automatically start in runlevels 3 & 5, that should provide a resolution for you. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fetchmail and Spamassassin together?

2004-10-20 Thread Anthony Edwards
er "topflite" password "***" limit 10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .mailfilter DEFAULT="Mail/inbox" logfile ".maildroplog" `reformail -D 8192 .duplicate.cache` if ( $RETURNCODE == 0 ) exit if ($SIZE < 10) xfilter "spamc" if (/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/) to Mail/junk (etc) -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Preferred DNSBL

2004-09-27 Thread Anthony Edwards
l of false positives. In our opinion these lists are best used as part of a scoring system, such as spamassassin and not for outright blocking of email. http://dsbl.org/usage -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.0 upgrade bug and fix (spamd reporting to log, but not tagging messages)

2004-09-26 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:12:53PM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote: > > > I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed > > using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
then subsequently upgrading one's SpamAssassin using cpan has benefits there too. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.0 upgrade bug and fix (spamd reporting to log, but not tagging messages)

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote: > I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed > using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done what > you have suggested above. I run a SuSE 8.2 system, and persuading

Re: SA 3.0 TRAP

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
ent in that file. Alternatively, perhaps the released version could be amended so that spamd is installed in /usr/sbin rather than /usr/bin, which is I understand what the Debian package maintainers have done (that wouldn't assist users who have already upgraded, of course). -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.0 upgrade bug and fix (spamd reporting to log, but not tagging messages)

2004-09-24 Thread Anthony Edwards
for the time being. Incidentally, a co-worker who runs a Debian system tells me that the Debian package maintainer has overcome the issue by creating the Debian SpamAssassin 3.0.0 package in such a way that spamd is installed in /usr/sbin/ rather than /usr/bin, as with previous versions. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SA 3.0 bugs ?

2004-09-23 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:51:54PM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote: > I have also been unable to persuade spamd to add spamassassin headers, > as per my posting of last night to the list. Running spamassassin, in > contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being

Re: SA 3.0 bugs ?

2004-09-23 Thread Anthony Edwards
ist. Running spamassassin, in contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being a local configuration issue?). -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

3.0.0 upgrade - no headers being added

2004-09-23 Thread Anthony Edwards
--1 anthony users2184 2004-09-22 23:49 1095894767.4440_1.ultra:2,S -rw-r--r--1 anthony users2184 2004-09-23 01:01 test This is preventing the use of SpamAssassin to filter mail, of course. What is needed to get SpamAssassin to add its usual tags and headers, as before? TI