nd cold email (thinking
the GDPR loophole here).
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Email Law & Policy Attorney
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
Creator of the term 'deliverability'; Co-Founder of the deliverability industry
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Dea
a little bit less heavy lifting, and can focus their resources on
>> actual spam?
>> That is the *entire* reason for our being
>
> with the new limits your beeing has no longer any reason
We are not Validity, we are the other guys, we have no limits, never have,
never will. We
, to help keep email usable
and to better identify good email versus spam so that receivers have to do a
little bit less heavy lifting, and can focus their resources on actual spam?
That is the *entire* reason for our being.
Anne
CEO ISIPP SuretyMail (the IADB Good Senders List, a/k/a "t
; voted in by PMC and approved by the ASF Board of Directors.
Congratulations, Giovanni! And congratulations to you, Sidney, on passing the
crown!
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Email Law & Policy Attorney
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law)
CEO Inst
(so far at least) is that
the 1 prefix of the phone number is actually an uppercase i (so "I" not "1"),
so that spam filters can identify the scams by filtering on "Call-I("
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Email Law & Policy Attorney
Legislative Advisor
Author:
month that Scott
Weiss started Bonded Sender).
All we ask is that if you are going to do a ton of querying, that you transfer
the zone to a local copy instead of querying directly.
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Email Law & Policy Attorney
Legislative Advisor
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPA
fact that we charge a relatively small
monthly sum to the senders makes firing them pretty painless. Thus it has
always been - best practices over money *always* - we can take this stand
because we are, always have been, and always will be, privately held, and the
buck stops with me).
Anne
--
Ann
B tests) not doing the right
thing!
Thank you,
Anne
---
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Internet Law & Policy Attorney
CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP)
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law)
Creator of the term 'deliverability
t for
deliverability (so *not*, for example, from your Gmail account), then send a
second email to supp...@gettotheinbox.com from the email account at which you'd
like to receive our findings, tell them Anne sent you :-), and in that second
email tell them who the test email was from, and the s
Does anyone have a copy of the netflix phishing that they could forward to me
at amitch...@isipp.com, including the body of it?
TIA!
Anne
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:04 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Since it's already hitt
rule-provision-under-can-spam-act
The more in-depth version is here:
https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/federal_register_notices/definitions-and-implementation-under-can-spam-act-16-cfr-part-316/080521canspamact.pdf
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecur
mailings, each of which you have to
> seek out individually) is … well, not going to work with many users,
> especially the less technical.
Not to mention that it is a violation of Federal law. Federal law requires a
"one-step" unsubscribe method.
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
The offending sender has been terminated by the ESP.
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
>
> Hi David!
>
> We are the IADB, and if you are getting spam from an accredited IP address,
> we definitely want to know about it. The reason that em
l take the responsible party to task for it,
and asap.
Can you please forward a copy, with headers, directly to me, and I will
personally make sure that it is taken care of, and with haste.
Thank you.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Poli
w the signature in muted colours, in a collapsed state, or by
> other means of making it less intrusive.
That's odd...until you mentioned it I wasn't aware that my MUA was *not*
including that!...let me see if I can figure out why it isn't. Thank you!
Anne
(suppressing .sig for now)
th you...however
when discussing things actually having to do with the law, I have found that
establishing my expertise and authority up front tends to ward off lengthy
discussions that take up way more mailing list bandwidth than the signature.
Much like this email, really.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Atto
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 21 Nov 2018, at 13:03, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>
>> Except for the private right of action provided in GDPR, and small claims
>> court in the U.S.
>
> Are you saying an EU law can create an ac
tty damned gutsy.
It will almost certainly be sorted out through lawsuits, and that will
definitely be popcorn time.
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 11:03 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 21, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Bill Cole
>> wrote:
>>
>> T
ere that it applies to EU residents or
citizens, only the vague and ambiguous "in the EU") the language in GDPR that
states they will go after anyone, anywhere in the world.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Sec
oupled with the private right of action suggests that you'd at least have a
shot. The reason that political spam is exempted in the U.S. is because of the
1st Amendment..which of course does not apply outside the U.S.. ;-)
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO
il is exempt
from most Federal law relating to email, email marketing, etc..
But THAT said, a word to their provider can (and sometimes does) still have the
desired (individual) effect, because providers care about their IP space
reputation (more so than most political campaigns).
Anne
An
oportionate benefit to the sender.”
Anything less is grounds for immediate termination.
So, again, if you ever find anything that triggers an IADB rule that is not
something for which you/your user affirmatively opted in, we want to know about
it.
The buck stops right here:
Anne
Anne P. Mitc
ally means the "you
don't get to run an affiliate program and look the other way while you profit
from your affiliates spamming - we're looking at you Gevalia" section." (*For
those of you who are also law/policy wonks, text of Section 6 available upon
request. :-)
smission and reception of the
message
appears to the recipient to give a disproportionate benefit to the sender.”
I think that it still holds up.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, I
Ironically, Gmail's spam filters have filtered every single one of the emails
in this thread. :-\
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public P
>
> My sense is that ESPs engage ISIPP thinking they are getting an advocate and
> ambassador to mailbox providers when in fact they get a teacher/evangelist
> for sender best practices.
ITYM 'schooled in best practices. ;-) ;-)
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/Presi
rified sign-ups such as through web page" (which is one of our
codes)
...they are never actually going to get certified (unless we can educate them
and they actually change their wicked ways).
You can see the full list of codes here:
http://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/about-the
already has tighter laws.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/President,
SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance
http://www.SuretyMail.com/
http://www.SuretyMail.eu/
Attorney at Law / Legislative Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (th
ated for SA because SA *can* take advantage of that level of
granularity)).
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/President,
SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance
http://www.SuretyMail.com/
http://www.SuretyMail.eu/
Attorney at Law / Legislative Consul
he *receiving* community
(for those who don't know, I came to this by way of being in-house counsel for
Paul Vixie and MAPS, so I am seriously anti-spam, and part of the receiving
community); but we can't address any issues if they aren't brought to our
attention. That just happene
MailChimp has said that they believe that they have terminated all accounts
that were responsible for this. BUT, they say, this is a group that keeps
cropping up (think whack-a-mole), so to please report any more of these that
anyone receives.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
Author
Sorry for top-posting, but just to let folks know, our contact has just let me
know that he is on this; I'll report back with anything I hear that I can share.
Anne
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Another email from a whitelisted mailchimp address that contains malware.
>>>
&
>
> On Friday 20 October 2017 at 19:29:31, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote:
>
>> Anne P. Mitchell,
>> Attorney at Law
>
> I'm intrigued as to what the "Esq." in your From address indicates?
>
> Please feel free to reply offlist if appropriate
; Complicating things, it's in Italian.
>
> I've reported it to MailChimp and also removed mailchimp (mcdlv.net
> and rsgsv.net) from the local whitelist.
Alex, may I share this, confidentially and directly, with our abuse czar
contact at Mailchimp?
And if so, can you please gi
than happy to do that - that's
*always* been how we do things - whatever makes it easiest for the *receiving*
community, with whom, at the end of the day, our allegiance lays. ;-)
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Hi,
DATE_IN_PAST_48_96 was taken out since 3.2.x. Why??
What happens with spam between 48 and 96 hours in the past?
thanks.
Anne
Anne Ramey wrote:
I'm installed SA 3.1 with Amavisd-new and postfix 2.2.5 on fedora core 3
and am having serious mail slowdowns, as much as and hour. I've figure
out it's SA because the SA check as taking 8-12 seconds, which was about
75%+ of the processing. I've been tr
Anne Ramey wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
Basically only two possibilities: you're thrashing the poor box to
death by
running out of memory, or network tests are taking an age. Or maybe
both.
ok, I had a pyzor test timing out, but I've removed that, and it's still
taking 6
ffers cached
Mem: 2007 1807200 0 23292
-/+ buffers/cache: 1491516
Swap: 2000 17 1982
`
Do you have a local caching DNS for the various RBL
checks?
not yet, the DNS server is just one hop.
Anne
Loren
n, but I
think this will slow mail down further. I'm at a loss. What else can I
do to optimize the performace?
Thanks
--
Anne
40 matches
Mail list logo
