addresses? I know Postfix is very flexible in that regard. No clue about
Exchange.
Good luck.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
spheric scores.
So even if we can decide an email is spam before the DATA stage, it makes no
difference since we have to store the thing for a while anyway in case the user
wants to look for something caught that shouldn't be.
Cheers,
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
rries if this group can not find a pattern to check for. Sometimes the
ONLY way to catch a spam is to deal with it based on the MTA sender characteristics.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
|ass(?:es|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|whip(?:ping|ped)?|spank(?:ing|ed)?)?|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|rap(?:e|ed|ing)+)\b/i
describe FS_TEEN_BAD Subject says something bad about girls or boys
##} FS_TEEN_BAD
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
s|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|whip(?:ing|ped)?|spank(?:ing|ed)?)?|fuck(?:ing|ed)?|rap(?:e|ed|ing)+)\b/i
describe FS_TEEN_BAD Subject says something bad about teens, girls, boys, others
##} FS_TEEN_BAD
Thank you again.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
quot; and
cover as many variations as I could think of. :-)
As written above, this still triggers on the original email that set off this
quest. And I think with the most recent changes it will be very unlikely to FPs.
But those could always be "famous last words".
Did I
o not want to
see ANY emails with selected words in the subject. But that is an individual
choice and not something we are going to apply system-wide.
Hooray for SpamAssassin, Open Source and being able to run our own filters as we
choose to!
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
BUZZHOST_STINGER wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:39 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 29-May-2009, at 07:32, Andy Dorman wrote:
1. I could not find out WHY our IPs (we have a block of 32 for the
cluster of servers that my email was being sent from) were being
listed
I do have to add this would be
is at all typical of this community, that will be useful
time-saving information for us indeed.
Bob, I can not speak for anyone else, but rest assured his juvenile response did
NOT represent me.
Cheers,
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
place). But happy
about it none the less.
However, I do still feel it is a little self-serving to block someone and then
"offer" to unblock them for money.
Thank you Neil for pointing out what I missed.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
ts. And NOBODY wins when it gets to that point.
Just wanted you to have ALL the facts when considering emailreg.org.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com, HomeFreeMail.com, ComeHome.net
Marc Perkel wrote:
Has anyone else noticed an increase in bot spam? My black list has grown
by about 1/3 in the last month.
We have seen an increase of over 50% in spam volume this month. A lot of it
does seem to be coming from bots.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
AnteSpam.com
empt any old cgi/php
script. That way lies chaos.
We were just hoping someone else in this group would have run into this
situation and have a suggestion, given how ubiquitous webmail is these days. If
not, we will keep pounding at it.
Thanks for your time.
--
Andy Dorman
Ironic Design, Inc.
Botnet to do is recognize that this is an HTTP transaction,
not smtp, and hence not hit on it.
We were first wondering if anyone else has encountered this issue and possibly
there is a fix we are not aware of?
Otherwise, we would be willing to give a shot at a patch to handle this issue.
J
14 matches
Mail list logo