Re: Low resource rules

2007-10-01 Thread Adam Wilbraham
uch brainpower from this > VPS box? ClamAV with the SaneSecurity definitions. www.sanesecurity.co.uk -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 221

Re: update from 3.1.7

2007-09-18 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:19:12 +0100 Adam Wilbraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might find that yoe need to also use dh-make-perl to fetch and > build some module other perl module dependencies too before SA will > build properly, all pretty straightforward though. Apologies

Re: update from 3.1.7

2007-09-18 Thread Adam Wilbraham
I > am running Debian Stable, and looking for some best practices. > > raj -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.te

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-03 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) User for SpamAssassin Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin version > Version: 3.0.3-2sarge1. My word, get yourself 3.1.7 from Sarge backports and run sa-update before you do anythi

Re: ETA for SA 3.2.2 for Debian

2007-07-31 Thread Adam Wilbraham
t; which I hope to speed up things a little) > > Greets > Chris > > -- > Christoph Petersen I've used dh-make-perl to build my own 3.2.2 packages from CPAN, seems to work prety well. Wilb -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Worksta

Re: RDJ 404's

2007-07-26 Thread Adam Wilbraham
y 2007 16:15 > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: Re: RDJ 404's > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Adam Wilbraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: RDJ 404's > > Dat

Re: RDJ 404's

2007-07-26 Thread Adam Wilbraham
;Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: Adam Wilbraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Subject: Re: RDJ 404's > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 > > >RulesDuJour is obsolete, y

Re: RDJ 404's

2007-07-26 Thread Adam Wilbraham
to download the rulesets too > often, you will receive an error message. If you are downloading > rulesets from many locations behind a proxy, please set up your own > ruleset repository for your clients. Again: One single download of > every file per 24 hours per IP address. &

Re: Debian and sa-update

2007-07-11 Thread Adam Wilbraham
3.1.7 version as I upgraded the server to Debian > 4.0. > > How can I be sure Spamassassin and Amavis are using the updated > rulesets ? > > Thanks for you help. > > Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007 à 10:12 +0100, Adam Wilbraham a écrit : > > You shouldn't need to add

Re: Debian and sa-update

2007-07-11 Thread Adam Wilbraham
: > > include /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.cf > > in local.cf ? > > More infos : I use Amavis to check emails incoming. > > Thanks for your help. > -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15

Building a new mail server with SA - should I use apt-get or cpan?

2007-06-06 Thread Adam Wilbraham
Has anyone got any experience with the pros and cons? Or am I worrying too much about nothing? Cheers, Wilb. -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMA

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-03-01 Thread Adam Wilbraham
> You said in your other email that "since the --local option disables > net tests, SA may pass a lot more spam". Does this mean it will think > a lot of legit email is spam, whereas before it knew it was legit? Nope, he means the opposite - that a lot more spam will get through as clean, as the

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 + Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IO::Socket::INET6 > IO::Socket::SSL > DBI > Mail::SPF::Query > IP::Country::Fast > Razor2::Client::Agent > Net::Ident After a quick apt-cache search I'd suggest these should be what you need: libsocket6-p

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:28 + Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for memory softlimits - i have no idea. How can i check? In your startup scripts for exim you may have some commands softlimit / ulimit commands...

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Adam Wilbraham
My only other thoughts are - maybe you may need to upgrade exim to a more recent version to keep the ability to talk to spamassassin working (probably not though...). Also have you got any memory softlimits set for exim / spamassassin or anything else ? In the past I've had issues with memory limit

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Adam Wilbraham
s or tries to do and > > what modules you might be missing and want. I had some missing > > modules that I installed from the regular sarge distro that I > > assume helped my functionality. > > > > 2) Add a channel for the SARE rulesets you want. This has been > >

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-27 Thread Adam Wilbraham
7;ve run the command below, is there anything i need to do, other > that restart the spamassassin daemon? > > Thanks again, > Hobbs. > > > Adam Wilbraham wrote: > > Yupp - try giving apt-get the "-t sarge-backports" switch to force > > it to download from

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-27 Thread Adam Wilbraham
tually running 3.0.3-2sarge1. > > Any ideas? > > The source does appear to have been added correctly, because during > the "apt-get update" it downloaded several files. > > Thanks again, > Richard. > > > Adam Wilbraham wrote: > > I've been

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-26 Thread Adam Wilbraham
3.1 via backports - works great! > > - John > > > > _____ > > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business > > Internet Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For > > further infor

Re: sa-update notification

2007-02-26 Thread Adam Wilbraham
now what it did > other than emailing the output to myself? RDJ used to send me a nice > email telling me what rules had changed. I don't find any > notification options with sa-update. > > - John > -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited

Re: Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

2006-11-29 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:22:13 -0600 Bookworm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds like you have the spamd bayes database, and then you have > the database for whatever user you're actually running the test > from. I ran into this problem as well - it's a known issue, and I > wish the SA folks wo

Re: Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

2006-11-29 Thread Adam Wilbraham
+ Adam Wilbraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a bit of an odd situation whereby some obvious spam seems to

Odd behaviour (?) of my Qmail / Qmail Scanner / SpamAssassin 3.1.3 Setup?

2006-11-29 Thread Adam Wilbraham
Hi, I've got a bit of an odd situation whereby some obvious spam seems to be slipping through the net of our setup. A prime example would be a "Re: hi" spam which has just come through, an obvious looking spam containing the text Hi and a drugs gif. Looking at the headers after qmail scanner has p