.
> The amount of CPU is dependent upon the size & content of the message
> (EG parsing a HTML message is more work than a plain text message).
>
> So if you're still hitting CPU load limits try limiting the message
> rates (at the MTA) and message sizes processed (skip large
record query of
domain.com.dbl.rbl.locallyhostedrbl.com.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Abhijeet Rastogi skrev den 2013-09-18 10:08:
>
>
>> I don't want queries URI-A and URI-NS to happen. URI-DNSBL is fine but
>> why others?
>
>
> its part of h
t 1:32 PM, Axb wrote:
> which rules do you see doing such queries?
>
> What happens if you score those rules to zero?
>
> THey are relevant to URIBL checks because they check for A or NS recs for a
> URI in a msg's body.
> this is also documented in URIBL.pm
>
> On
That's the thing. Why do they happen? I don't want them to happen?
What's their relevance in a URIBL check?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 08:35 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>>
>> HI Axb,
>>
>> But, we don't require
HI Axb,
But, we don't require A and NS lookups for a domain to query for it's
existence in URIBL, right? I don't see the point of doing the NS
lookups in URIBL module.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 06:59 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>>
_lookup_callback. Is there a reason why URI-A and URI-NS are
done unconditionally and don't have a option to disable them?
Is there a way I can disable them?
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?\n";
> --
> Bowie
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
r.
I could still see checks like
"HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY" in 'X-Spam-Status:'
header. These checks are essentially defined in /var/lib/spamassassin
only.
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
ing.
>
> Now if you do:
> spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 | grep 'config:'
>
> it will tell you all the rules files that it's processing
> (and a bunch of other stuff too).
>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>
27;ll need to provide some minimal set of config files in whatever
> custom config directory you specify in order to get SA to run, but that will
> avoid all the extra default stuff you don't seem to want.
>
> I've never customized SA to that degree so there may be some pitfal
Hi John,
Did a
$grep -inr __HAS_SENDER ./
in the source. No hits, what-so-ever.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:37 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I'm sure you're pretty clear on explaining it but as
;^(header|body)' | awk '{print $2}' | sed
's/^/score /' | sed 's/$/ 0/'
But, to my surprise, it didn't help. I still had various checks stull
getting applied like __HAS_TO, __HAS_ERRORS_TO etc etc. Any idea as to
what can be done about that?
On Mon, Sep 16
53 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to disable few RBLs & while doing that I observed that if I
> want to just disable spamhaus, I've to actually disable
> "__RCVD_IN_ZEN" after disabling the other spamhaus related checks like
> "check_rbl
to a check like
"RCVD_IN_SBL"? I don't see how these two are related, except the
hostname being used?
Is there a good doc that tells me how to write these tests? May be,
that'll give me some insight. Thanks
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
