The FH_DATE_PAST_20XX is getting triggered on our system this week. It did not
happen
last week when the year 2010 started. The first triggered event seems to have
been Jan 5th.
The Spam Report header reads:
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
but looking at the rest o
Which rule is checking to see that the Message-ID line has a TLD after the @ ?
One of the users (actually the boss) had the email address harvested and we got
clobbered
by backscatter. Looking at the emails of the various 'unable to deliver' type
messages, I saw
what these could be filtered on, but don't know how to write up and implement
the rule
outside of procmail. I
SA 3.20 was working okay, went for the 3.24 update. It installed , but upon
restarting
spamd I got error messages. I'd appreciate information on how to fix the
local.cf file.
Here is the log:
Mon Mar 24 10:56:02 2008 [22312] info: logger: removing stderr method
Mon Mar 24 10:56:09 2008 [22314]
h each
> message and I see no way or value in have this function defined at a
> set number.
>
> I wish they would change the name of this thing to something more
> descriptive.
>
> .rp wrote:
> in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf there is an entry
> auto_whitelist_facto
in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf there is an entry
auto_whitelist_factor 0.7
Yet in the scoring , the listing is:
* header * -0.1 AWL AWL: From:address is in the auto white-list
where did the -0.1 come from? how can i change it to -1.0 ?
thanks.
then it would be a good idea to post the results logs of the various build
stages.
it may even be that the spamassassin is not getting built.
On 16 May 2007 at 16:58, Sunil Chelaramani wrote:
> I am trying to compile from source files.
>
> On 5/15/07, .rp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 14 May 2007 at 15:07, Sunil Chelaramani wrote:
> Hello Group/Everyone,
>
> I am trying to setup SPAMD on Fedora Core but no luck. I would
> appreciate if anyone can point to the documentation which guides
> though step-by-step to get started with Spamd :-)
>
> I will appreciate any help.
>
>
On 10 May 2007 at 18:40, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > no one has ideas why the SA3.2 is complaining about having rights to
> > the .spamassassin file when the same non-root user is being used for
> > spamd and spamc ?
>
> If I had to guess I'd say that the non-root user doesn't have rights
> to t
On 9 May 2007 at 22:34, Matt Kettler wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 09 May 2007 22:34:48 -0400
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: 3 spamc questions, version 3.2
To: ".rp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies
I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail.
* is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc?
* spamd is running with
'-d -H -s /usr/temp/spamd.log -u esp -r /var/run/spamd.pid' .
spamc is running with '-u esp' , which is a normal account.
Yet in the
looks like I found the problematic file:
70_imageinfo.cf
was in /etc/mail/spamassassin
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:55:07 -0700, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Maybe I'm doing something wrong but with the various methods of
> > > bayes poisoning going on I've found that bayes is just lowering
> > > the score
> > of
> > > spam and causing more spam to get through.
On 10 Feb 2007 at 11:43, Dan wrote:
> I've developed a new approach to scoring that I want to 1) share with
> everyone and 2) make into a working system thats as accurate as what
> I've already built, but easier to use. First, the theory:
>[...]
> NEW SITUATION
> Ham is now the tiniest minorit
using the DAG site and rpm -U, I updated spamassassin and spamassissin-tools to
3.1.7-1
Things don't look so good. Here is what happened when I restarted spamd
spamd[26917]: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting down
spamd[27082]: persistent_udp: no such method at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_per
Hi,
In our system wide .procmail I have been using /usr/bin/spammassin. Recently
the
CPU usage has soared when spamassassin ran so I decided to use /usr/bin/spamc
with spamd running as a dameon.
well, it didn't quite work. here is a sample problem:
| /usr/bin/spamc -u $LOGNAME
sendmail[219
> My email is through my website: www.rimesrv.net which is hosted on
> www.totalchoicehosting.com and they use Spam Assassin for spam
> filtering. I don't know a lot about SA.
>
> Over the last weeks or a month my spam has increased dramatically.
> What is particularly frustrating is that I get
hi,
In the procmailrc I had
/usr/bin/spamassassin -a
I just updated to SA3.1.1 and my log got full of error messages about invalid
option.
Is the '-a' just gone or has it been replaced?
The man spamassasin was basically useless and the --help didn't provide any
information about '-a'
> >
> > I have spamd running, but there is no sock file being created for
> > sendmail to "hook" into to. and i do mean no sock file anywhere on
> > the system that belongs to spamd. Where is the sock?
>
> spamd isn't a milter, thus it doesn't create a socket for sendmail to
> hook to. Spamd cre
and no, it is not in the dryer :-)
I have spamd running, but there is no sock file being created for sendmail
to "hook" into to. and i do mean no sock file anywhere on the system that
belongs to spamd. Where is the sock?
> (Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
> allow anything else) how do I set up my /etc/procmailrc file such that
> all mail that is marked as SPAM is put into the users $HOME/mail/spam
> file (they can then login using SSH and use Pine to look at SPAM if
$LOGNAME i
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:51, Matt Kettler wrote:
> No, you can use a procmail rule to funnel the non-spam messages into
> spamassassin -d, which will remove the markup.
>
Thank you, that is what I did,
:0fw:clearSA.lck
* ^X-Spam-Status: No
| spamassassin -d
SA 2.64
sendmail 8.13
procmail
SA is being called in the system wide procmail and not as a milter.
I would like to strip the SA X- headers for those emails that are not
considered spam. Is formail the only way to do this?
I did not have a problem downloading it this week.
same here.
On 10 Jan 2005 at 7:45, Nichols, William wrote:
> I will be sticking with 2.64 for a while as well.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:42 AM
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: maintaining
On 9 Dec 2004 at 13:14, Michael Chan wrote:
> All,
> I have a system setting in procmail which puts email
> marked as spam from spamassassin into each user's
> spambucket at the server side. But some user wants
> the spam to be deliver to them marked by spamassassin
> as spam mail. I plan to use
Does spamd burn up the CPU if you do not have the Bayes turned on?
If not, then I humbly suggest to turn off the Bayes in SA and
use bogofilter to handle the Bayes processing.
we are using Version 1.18 and have come across the problem of when
people send us comma delimited files as part of the email instead of as an
attachment. Is there a way to tell spamassassin (or chickenpox) that if the
score gets above 15 to ignore this message and let it on through?
Is there a
On 8 Sep 2004 at 20:55, John Fleming wrote:
> > > P.S. If you know how to get my mail command back, I obviously would
> like to
> > > know that too! It used to be there, and I have no idea why it
> disappeared!
> > >
> >
What do you get when you run
locate mail ?
29 matches
Mail list logo
