Re: Ways to reduce calls to Validity BLs (was Validity (return path blocklist))

2025-05-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2025-05-08 09:44:18 -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > That is absolutely true but it is not *for me* a sufficient reason to remove > a longstanding rule. I would need to be convinced that the marginal > improvements in noise and privacy for most users greatly outweighs the risk > that removing the rules

Re: Ways to reduce calls to Validity BLs (was Validity (return path blocklist))

2025-05-27 Thread Bill Cole
On 2025-05-27 at 09:54:38 UTC-0400 (Tue, 27 May 2025 15:54:38 +0200) Vincent Lefevre is rumored to have said: On 2025-05-08 09:44:18 -0400, Bill Cole wrote: That is absolutely true but it is not *for me* a sufficient reason to remove a longstanding rule. I would need to be convinced that the