On 6/3/21 6:36 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
this change score with default -100 even for spammy msgs
On 03.06.21 22:02, Grant Taylor wrote:
This is a very critical point to me.
1) it's not *all* spam. It's spam with a score of up to 100+whatever
cut off you're using.
2) SpamAssassin still do
Hi Gang
In the last couple of weeks, I have seen a lot of spam mails containing
just one single PDF, hardly any other text. That PDF again contains a
clickable picture leading to some phishing site or similar.
Of course the URL in the PDF is not being checked against URI
Blacklists.
Also creatin
On 6/3/21 6:36 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
this change score with default -100 even for spammy msgs
This is a very critical point to me.
1) it's not *all* spam. It's spam with a score of up to 100+whatever
cut off you're using.
2) SpamAssassin still does it's spam processing. Meaning it's n
On 03.06.21 09:23, Henrik K wrote:
> That's just outdated information. It's fine to scan even 20MB+ messages, it
> just requires some memory.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and CPU and time...
On 03.06.21 11:14, Henrik K wrote:
Those are affected ve
On 2021-06-03 08:23, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:15:03AM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
Even more limiting, spamassassin is designed for small to medium size
messages, scanning anything over 500KB or so is going to be a resource
hog.
That's just outdated information. It's fine to sc
On 2021-06-03 07:22, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Hello Folks,
Is there any possible way using we can scan for the content of an
attachment ie .doc/pdf/.xls/ppt etc...
Planning is to have a DLP kind of protection with the help of
Spamassassin.
good plans, but spamassassin is not a malware project o
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:39:08AM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
>
> Also, spamassassin does not have a native built-in component for parsing
> such media attachments, it would need to be some kind of add-in (EG the
> "fuzzy ocr" plugin that was the rage a while ago).
> As such it adds an additional comp
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.06.21 09:23, Henrik K wrote:
That's just outdated information. It's fine to scan even 20MB+ messages, it
just requires some memory.
and CPU and time...
Those are affected very
> On 03 Jun 2021, at 01:32, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:15:03AM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
>>> Even more limiting, spamassassin is designed for small to medium size
>>> messages, scanning anything over 500KB or so is going to be a resource hog.
>
> 500KB is defa
On 2021-06-03 06:39, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Here on this setup I have Postfix - spamassassin - Domino HCL
And this "all spam to" would mean that mail with spam flag will be
forwarding to this email Address?
spamassassin does not reject mails
?>but users in all_spam_to should never get mail bl
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.06.21 09:23, Henrik K wrote:
> > That's just outdated information. It's fine to scan even 20MB+ messages, it
> > just requires some memory.
>
> and CPU and time...
Those are affected very little by message size. And
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:15:03AM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
Even more limiting, spamassassin is designed for small to medium size
messages, scanning anything over 500KB or so is going to be a resource hog.
500KB is default max size for spamc, not for spamassassin itself.
You can rise it.
On 03.
On 03.06.21 06:39, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Here on this setup I have Postfix - spamassassin - Domino HCL
And this "all spam to" would mean that mail with spam flag will be
forwarding to this email Address?
no. It means that addresses in all_spam_to (not "all spam to") will be
whitelisted:
score
13 matches
Mail list logo
