On 03.06.21 09:23, Henrik K wrote:
> That's just outdated information.  It's fine to scan even 20MB+ messages, it
> just requires some memory.

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and CPU and time...

On 03.06.21 11:14, Henrik K wrote:
Those are affected very little by message size.  And all that is pretty much
negated by large messages being uncommon.

depends, I've had problems few times when receiving huge mail with much of
text content...

yes, most of that was parsing BAYES tokens, amount of which can be limited
now, but there still may be bottlenecks.

Also, I use FuzzyOCR which needs time.

afaik, SA4 will support different file types parsers, which is perfect idea
but will take time too.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?

Reply via email to