On Tue, 4 May 2021, Denis Chenu wrote:
Yes,
You receive spam from pro and then all pro gTLD owner received a punishment.
One whole point. Wooo.
You're badly overreacting to this. This rule is not a "poison pill", it
will not by itself put your mail over a threshold leading to it being
quar
Subject: How to Host Multiple Mail Domains (Email Hosting) in iRedMail
Full Featured Linux Mail Server
Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming (TARGETED INDIVIDUAL)
Country: Singapore
Date: 3rd May 2021 Monday
Type of Publication: PDF Manual
Document Version: 20210503.01
***IMPORTANT NOTICE**
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 08:28 +0200, Denis Chenu wrote:
> Yes,
>
> You receive spam from pro and then all pro gTLD owner received a punishment.
>
> It's same for all gTLDS, like the old teachers who punish a whole school
> class.
>
You're right, but as someone who blocks .pro I don't care an
Le 04/05/2021 à 09:47, Paul Stead a écrit :
To be fair, we are very much lacking masscheckers to have a good view of
global mail.
Agreed!
If anyone has a decend mail flow, help is welcome. Even a few
hundreds of
varied messages per month would help:
https://cwiki.ap
> To be fair, we are very much lacking masscheckers to have a good view of
> global mail.
>
Agreed!
> If anyone has a decend mail flow, help is welcome. Even a few hundreds of
> varied messages per month would help:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/NightlyMassCheck
>
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:31:02AM +0100, Paul Stead wrote:
>
> The score is derived from the combined corpus of our contributors to ensure
> minimal false positives of ham being detected as spam - that is, scoring 5.0
> or
> more.
>
> I feel that [2]mail-tester.com creates the impression that y
> The score is derived from the combined corpus of our contributors to
> ensure minimal false positives of ham being detected as spam - that is,
> scoring 5.0 or more.
>
I don't feel I've done masscheck justice here. The routine is a lot more
complex than this! I should also note that masscheck tr
This particular rule was split out from the more generic SUSP_URI_NTLD rule
due to a conversation about this particular TLD recently.
The consensus was to create an individual rule so that mass check could
check the TLD on its own merit -
https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20210503-r1889443-n/PDS_PRO
