On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:31:02AM +0100, Paul Stead wrote: > > The score is derived from the combined corpus of our contributors to ensure > minimal false positives of ham being detected as spam - that is, scoring 5.0 > or > more. > > I feel that [2]mail-tester.com creates the impression that you should have no > matching "bad" rules, ever, which isn't true or how masscheck/SA works.
To be fair, we are very much lacking masscheckers to have a good view of global mail. If anyone has a decend mail flow, help is welcome. Even a few hundreds of varied messages per month would help: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/NightlyMassCheck
