I believe if you install a version of sa yourself from a tar, you will see
they use a .raw file without the Perl hardcoded. It is then relaxed at
install time.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 20:29 L A Walsh wrote:
> Putting the questions/wants 1st, for those wanting the bottom line.
> For backstory/why,
Putting the questions/wants 1st, for those wanting the bottom line.
For backstory/why, see further on.
2 things:
1) Is it too much effort to only use the major/minor for sa-files?
i.e. instead of numbering: "3.002000/ 3.004000/ 3.004004/" using
"3.002/ 3.004/" ...? Where the patch leve
Here are my notes for disabling it if it helps. You might also be able to
uninstall something like perl-local-lib too.
DONE - #DISABLE Local::Lib to stop installations of perl modules from ONLY
working for one user. We want them on the whole box
unset PERL5LIB PERL_MB_OPT PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT
On 2020/10/25 13:00, Bill Cole wrote:
A common source of such problems is widespread adoption of the
local::lib module which creates a per-user Perl library tree for each
user of CPAN, even root. If that's not disabled, it can result in
independent module trees with different versions of the sa
On 2020/10/25 07:58, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
This sounds like a path issue and you have two versions of SA
installed.
Yeah, sorta.
One perhaps from a package manager like yum or apt and
another from cpan.
Both by me, but I didn't know the "sa-" ignored
where the
On 25 Oct 2020, at 12:06, RW wrote:
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:12:39 -0700
L A Walsh wrote:
On 2020/10/18 09:22, L A Walsh wrote:
On 2020/10/17 15:58, RW wrote:
Probably a networking problem at the time sa-update ran.
status: 1792 decodes to a curl error code of 7 "Failed to connect
to host".
I
is it possible to get ASN from this dbfile ?
using it with country lookup, would be good to stop using dns services
On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:08 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > I use this to send a copy of all outbound mail to a local mailbox.
> > Then periodically a cronjob scans and erases the mailbox content,
> > adding the To: address(es) to a list of correspondents. IME this is
> > safe
At 25 October, 2020 Marc Roos wrote:
> From: Marc Roos
> To: mysqlstudent , users
>
> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:57:27 +0100
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=4.0
> tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,
> UR
> make a reality check outside your small bubble!
typical low iq response. I was already discussing the validity of these
soccerplayer contracts before they had to change the system.
> when you have millions of customers you can do whatever you want all
day long and you are
> simply not able
Bob Proulx skrev den 2020-10-25 19:08:
I also have a tool for weeding undesirables from the correspondent
list
because spamming addresses can creep onto the list, but its very
infrequently needed.
It is a clever idea! I might add something similar to my own setup.
:-)
amavisd have penpal,
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Its easy enough to create a list all desirable correspondents, at least
> if your MTA has the equivalent of Postfix's 'always_bcc' directive.
>
> I use this to send a copy of all outbound mail to a local mailbox. Then
> periodically a cronjob scans and erases the mailbox
John Hardin skrev den 2020-10-25 01:46:
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John skrev den 2020-10-24 21:30:
A regular source of spam is outlook.com;
is spamassassin say is not spam ?
in that case:
blacklist_from *@outlook.com
...and then whitelist specific desireable-corresponden
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 24.10.20 22:19, Juerg Reimann wrote:
This is what I did, it works a 100% :).
outlook.com REJECT Too much spam from outlook.com, please use another
email service.
OTOH, outlook.com responds mail sent to abuse@ address, assuring you it h
I have been looking into exactly the same, don't know how I am going to
implement it still. What I know for now.
This is how you can get info on a netblock owner.
[@]$ dig +short -t txt 80.53.103.176.origin.asn.cymru.com
'48031 | 176.103.48.0/20 | UA | ripencc | 2011-12-09'
You can then eith
Hi, I have a spamassassin-3.4.4 install with amavisd-2.12 and postfix
on fedora32 and would like to be able to block email from an entire
country on a per-user or per-domain basis. What is the best way to do
this?
I'm currently using the RelayCountry plugin and Amavis::Custom to add
an X-Relay-Cou
Are you guys working for Google or Amazon or so? Maybe I should give
something simple analogy so you understand.
If your neighbours washing machine breaks down, and causes you water
damage. They have to pay for cleaning up de mess they created in your
apartment. If the neighbour spills oil o
On Sunday 25 October 2020 at 17:05:26, Marc Roos wrote:
> Google, Amazon and Microsoft have billions of cash. It is indeed a
> wonder how they are not spending it on outgoing mail detection.
Why do they need to?
Customers use their services anyway, and are either:
a) spammers, in which case the
If you block something, you have to ask yourself: How many innocent,
unsuspecting legitimate senders
Who cares, these "unsuspecting legitimate senders" should take their
business somewhere else.
This is extremist. You are confusing offenders with victims. Fight
offenders, not victims. Every s
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:12:39 -0700
L A Walsh wrote:
> On 2020/10/18 09:22, L A Walsh wrote:
> > On 2020/10/17 15:58, RW wrote:
> >
> >> Probably a networking problem at the time sa-update ran.
> >> status: 1792 decodes to a curl error code of 7 "Failed to connect
> >> to host".
> >> I suspect
> all huge mail providers with thousands/millions of customers, so there
> is no wonder there is spam included.
Google, Amazon and Microsoft have billions of cash. It is indeed a
wonder how they are not spending it on outgoing mail detection.
> mail services to a mono-culture of single huge
A regular source of spam is outlook.com; or at least that is the
domain that delivered the junk to my domain.
Outlook.com is a legitimate email provider and not known for ignoring
reports. If you block outlook.com, you have to block google.com for the
same reason. And everything sent through ama
This sounds like a path issue and you have two versions of SA installed.
One perhaps from a package manager like yum or apt and another from cpan.
Your root installation likely has a different path, hence the discrepancy.
And sa-update rights to /var/lib/spamassassdin by default so likely a
non-pri
On 24.10.20 22:19, Juerg Reimann wrote:
This is what I did, it works a 100% :).
outlook.com REJECT Too much spam from outlook.com, please use another email
service.
OTOH, outlook.com responds mail sent to abuse@ address, assuring you it has
been dealt with, while gmail does not.
of course,
On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 16:46 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> ...and then whitelist specific desireable-correspondent outlook.com
> addresses.
>
Its easy enough to create a list all desirable correspondents, at least
if your MTA has the equivalent of Postfix's 'always_bcc' directive.
I use this to se
On Sat, October 24, 2020 16:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> John skrev den 2020-10-24 21:30:
>
>> A regular source of spam is outlook.com;
>>
>
> is spamassassin say is not spam ?
>
> in that case:
>
> blacklist_from *@outlook.com
>
> if it contains urls, is this urls unlisted ?
>
> i see low scooring
26 matches
Mail list logo
