Hello Dave,
Tuesday, March 19, 2019, 12:11:40 AM, you wrote:
> On 2019-03-18 17:40, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> On 18 Mar 2019, at 13:59, James wrote:
>>> On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
> I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
You inboxes lik
On 2019-03-18 17:40, @lbutlr wrote:
On 18 Mar 2019, at 13:59, James wrote:
On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
You inboxes likely contain spam messages that haven't been caught, so training
on inbox will pois
> On 18 Mar 2019, at 13:59, James wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
>>> I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
>> You inboxes likely contain spam messages that haven't been caught, so
>> training on inbox will poison your bayes in favor
John Capo skrev den 2019-03-18 20:30:
John
Received: from beta.mxes.net (beta.mxes.net [205.237.207.247])
by beta.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 138833AE9F;
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:30:08 -0400 (EDT)
are this really a secure problem ?
password over no tls :/
On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
You inboxes likely contain spam messages that haven't been caught, so training
on inbox will poison your bayes in favor of more spam. Unless your inbox is
perfect (entirely dev
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:21:56 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> The big blindspots of the automated rule QA and rescoring system is
> that it can't account for the effects of ... and Bayes,
If it didn't account for the effects of Bayes there wouldn't be any
point in separate Bayes score sets. Hopefully
On Sun, March 17, 2019 22:57, James wrote:
> On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote:
>
>> On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote:
>>
>>> I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
>>> "required" number.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tin
On 18 Mar 2019, at 0:45, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote:
On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote:
On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote:
What is the Bayes score for the missed spam?
This is from a missed spam.
How do I see the bayes score?
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, at 22:45, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote:
> > $ sudo sa-learn --dump magic
> > 0.000 04665448 0 non-token data: nspam
> > 0.000 0 51031938 0 non-token data: nham
>
> I'd generally expect those numbers to be so
