Problem with new rules

2018-07-24 Thread chuckee
I'm from a reasonably large ESP and we handle all types of emails being sent via our servers. We've noticed a change with SpamAssassin in the last few days/weeks which is causing problems. The following 2 rules are causing these problems: 3.5 HDR_ORDER_FTSDMCXX_DIRECT Header order similar to spam a

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Nick Bright wrote: On 7/24/2018 9:58 AM, John Hardin wrote: However, unless you *really* trust the people who are providing training data, you don't train on the submissions without first reviewing them. Therefore, forwarding as an RFC-822 attachment isn't a deal-killer.

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Kris Deugau
Nick Bright wrote: On 7/23/2018 11:49 PM, Bill Cole wrote: The goal is to get a copy of the message that is identical to what SA saw when it arrived. For IMAP users, this is easiest to get with a 'missed spam' mailbox into which users can move messages for learning. If you must rely on forward

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Bill Cole
On 24 Jul 2018, at 13:39, Nick Bright wrote: On 7/23/2018 11:49 PM, Bill Cole wrote: The goal is to get a copy of the message that is identical to what SA saw when it arrived. For IMAP users, this is easiest to get with a 'missed spam' mailbox into which users can move messages for learning.

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Nick Bright
On 7/24/2018 9:58 AM, John Hardin wrote: However, unless you *really* trust the people who are providing training data, you don't train on the submissions without first reviewing them. Therefore, forwarding as an RFC-822 attachment isn't a deal-killer. You can review the submission and if you

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Nick Bright
On 7/24/2018 1:47 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote: >On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 1:38:59 AM GMT+2, Nick Bright wrote: >So I ask: what is the best practice for learning submissions when usingĀ  site-wide bayes? Nick, do all your users use the same MUA? There are some user level "plug-ins" that may

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Nick Bright
On 7/23/2018 11:49 PM, Bill Cole wrote: The goal is to get a copy of the message that is identical to what SA saw when it arrived. For IMAP users, this is easiest to get with a 'missed spam' mailbox into which users can move messages for learning. If you must rely on forwarded submissions, make

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Alex
Hi, >> The problem I'm trying to solve is "how to implement a training system on >> my server". > > I'd suggest a manual review step before feeding the messages to Bayes. > > You **WILL** get users reporting all kinds of "unwanted today because > Reasons" but otherwise legitimate email as spam. W

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread RW
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:38:48 -0500 Nick Bright wrote: > When requesting submissions from users for use with sa-learn, if they > are going to forward the message somewhere; is it best for that to be > forwarded as an attachment, or forwarded inline? Don't use forward inline, the choice is betwe

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Nick Bright wrote: On 7/23/2018 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: what exactly is the problem right-click on the attachments, save them to files and drag&drop them to the imap training folder? What on earth is even right about it? I'm not going to do that for hundreds or even

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Nick Bright wrote: On 7/23/2018 7:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: provide imap-shared folders and code a script which fetches the raw-messages and fires sa-learn to the eml-files *never* train inline-forwardings And when that isn't an option, for example with POP3 clients?

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread RW
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:34:42 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote: > Kris Deugau wrote: > > Nick Bright wrote: > > > >> The problem I'm trying to solve is "how to implement a training > >> system on my server". > > > > I'd suggest a manual review step before feeding the messages to > > Bayes. > > > > Yo

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Kris Deugau
Kris Deugau wrote: Nick Bright wrote: The problem I'm trying to solve is "how to implement a training system on my server". I'd suggest a manual review step before feeding the messages to Bayes. You **WILL** get users reporting all kinds of "unwanted today because Reasons" but otherwise leg

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Kris Deugau
Nick Bright wrote: The problem I'm trying to solve is "how to implement a training system on my server". I'd suggest a manual review step before feeding the messages to Bayes. You **WILL** get users reporting all kinds of "unwanted today because Reasons" but otherwise legitimate email as spa

Re: Best practice for learning submissions

2018-07-24 Thread Alex Woick
Nick Bright schrieb am 24.07.2018 um 01:38: So I ask: what is the best practice for learning submissions when using site-wide bayes? From what I learnt about best practice: - before implementing spam-learning based on user-submissions, figure out how educated your users are with identifyin