Re: Method of setting score for a custom rule to be the required_score ?

2018-06-27 Thread J Doe
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Daniele Duca wrote: > Hi, > > I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircuit: > body __BODY_TEST1 . . . > body __BODY_TEST2 . . . > meta CUSTOM_RULE1(__BODY_TEST1 && __BODY_TEST2) > shortcircuit CUSTOM_RULE1 spam > > At least that saves computin

SPF PermError (was: "Re: Scans and Invoice spam containg HREF to something bad")

2018-06-27 Thread Chip M.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Andy Smith wrote: > Testing despite these errors the only rule I'm getting a hit on from KAM > is JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL_ALL Andy, thanks for the very useful spamples! :) Could somebody do a sanity check on the SPF record for "ballybofeycarpets.com"? I get a PermEr

Re: Method of setting score for a custom rule to be the required_score ?

2018-06-27 Thread Daniele Duca
On 27/06/2018 02:15, J Doe wrote: Hi John, Ok, good to know. Is it possible with the SA grammar to have variables ?  I was thinking I’d have something like the following in my: /etc/spamassassin/local.cf     POISON_PILL = 100 Hi, I'd say that a better solution would be to use shortcircu