It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is scored at
0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so it displaces as
.01.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linked
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> Actually, I retract that suggestion, I wasn't aware of the special
> automatic scoring for T_ rules. Leave it alone.
There's little point in this case, but I don't think there's any harm in
changing such scores locally. IIRC the "T_"
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply John,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7
tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
always the score i
Thanks Tom,
my scores were definitely a problem.
Thanks again,
Motty
On 04/05/2018 09:48 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 05-04-18 18:40, Motty Cruz wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply John,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7
tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BA
On 05-04-18 18:40, Motty Cruz wrote:
> Thanks for your prompt reply John,
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7
> tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>
BAYES_00
Thanks for your prompt reply John,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7
tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
always the score is -0.01 regardless; I will take your sug
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:12:45 -0700
Motty Cruz wrote:
> Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD this rule is allowing spammy emails past
> through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf?
How's that happening? A T_* rule only scores +/- 0.01.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD this rule is allowing spammy emails past through.
Is there a way to disable in local.cf?
The best way to disable it without breaking any meta-rules that may be
using it is to set its score to 0.001 in your local config file.
I
Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD this rule is allowing spammy emails past
through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf?
Thanks,
Motty
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Kris Deugau wrote:
Alex wrote:
We're also seeing it hit mailer-daemon emails.
https://pastebin.com/raw/UXnzEN8U
This one also hit FUZZY_AMBIEN, POISEN_SPAM_PILL (spelling incorrect)
and when I re-ran it here locally, FUZZY_DR_OZ.
The problem is that it's hitting on the m
It found "xon, OX" in "Aylesbury Road, Thame, Oxon, OX9 3AT"
It's an aggressive rule that finds anything that might be an
obfuscated Xanax. It only scores 0.8 points because it can produce FPs
like this.
Actually that is my private, custom score. I think the default is 2.8
or something like
Alex wrote:
We're also seeing it hit mailer-daemon emails.
https://pastebin.com/raw/UXnzEN8U
This one also hit FUZZY_AMBIEN, POISEN_SPAM_PILL (spelling incorrect)
and when I re-ran it here locally, FUZZY_DR_OZ.
The problem is that it's hitting on the mime attachments which are
apparently trea
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Pastebin a sample(s).
We're also seeing it hit mailer-daemon emails.
https://pastebin.com/raw/UXnzEN8U
This one also hit FUZZY_AMBIEN, POISEN_SPAM_PILL (spelling incorrect)
and when I re-ran it here locally, FUZZY_DR_OZ.
The proble
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:58:39 +0200
Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
> Hello Giovanni,
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:04:46AM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > if you start spamd from /root and you use a perl module that is
> > using "use lib 'lib';" or similar piece of code the relevant code
> > will not
It found "xon, OX" in "Aylesbury Road, Thame, Oxon, OX9 3AT"
It's an aggressive rule that finds anything that might be an
obfuscated Xanax. It only scores 0.8 points because it can produce FPs
like this.
Actually that is my private, custom score. I think the default is 2.8
or something like
On 04/02/2018 09:50 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 02/04/18 14:58, RW wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:26:27 -0500
David Jones wrote:
On 04/02/2018 07:18 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Thank you - one example here: https://pastebin.com/UGStfCys
It found "xon, OX" in "Aylesbury Road, Thame, Oxon, OX
16 matches
Mail list logo