On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply John,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7
tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
always the score is -0.01 regardless; I will take your suggestion and set it
to 0.01, will report back shortly.
Actually, I retract that suggestion, I wasn't aware of the special
automatic scoring for T_ rules. Leave it alone.
Why do you think that a rule scoring -0.01 is responsible for FN scores?
It may be due to its use as a suppressor in some metas, but absent the
full spam we can't check for that.
Thanks,
On 04/05/2018 09:32 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD this rule is allowing spammy emails past
through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf?
The best way to disable it without breaking any meta-rules that may be
using it is to set its score to 0.001 in your local config file.
I don't see a score for it in the latest rules update, so it should by
default be *adding* one point to scores, which won't contribute to FNs.
What is it currently scored in your environment?
It is, however, used as a suppressor subrule in some spam meta-rules. Is
that why it's causing FNs for you?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Windows and its users got mentioned at home today, after my wife the
psych major brought up Seligman's theory of "learned helplessness."
-- Dan Birchall in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 days until Thomas Jefferson's 275th Birthday
