Original Message
Subject: Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per
token really, really slow or roughly normal?
From: David Jones
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Sat Nov 04 2017 16:35:02 GMT+0300 (AST)
> On 11/04/2017 08:09 AM, David Gesse
Original Message
Subject: Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per
token really, really slow or roughly normal?
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue Oct 31 2017 23:05:23 GMT+0300 (AST)
> dovecot's antspam plugin
On 11/04/2017 08:09 AM, David Gessel wrote:
so days later, still chunking away, not making much progress.
If I kill the process (doesn't stop sa-learn, just kills current script), it
always returns
^Cplugin: eval failed: interrupted at /usr/local/bin/sa-learn line 511.
which is
0509 sub kil
so days later, still chunking away, not making much progress.
If I kill the process (doesn't stop sa-learn, just kills current script), it
always returns
^Cplugin: eval failed: interrupted at /usr/local/bin/sa-learn line 511.
which is
0509 sub killed {
0510 $spamtest->finish_le
Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto:
[..]
sieve does not work on backup MX, since sieve runs at delivery time
which
does not happen on backup MX (unless you hack it to)
Well
Actually the backup MX server when mark an email as spam simply
forward to primary
and this is exactly how backup MX
