Hi - I received a spam message with the following double From address:
From: struth...@psfc.mit.edu, "Lorraine M."
But neither of the 2 previously suggested rules were triggered by it.
I'm sure a simple modification to the rules will cause it to trigger.
Can we get an official rule to test
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
versions of SA code. I
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
> I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
> masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
> versions of SA code. I have
> On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
>>
>>> I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
>>> masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
>>> versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" opt
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to
put the
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly masscheck
process that has been holding up any rule updates or new versions of SA code.
I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to put the missing scores in
72_scores.cf into the sta
On 10/16/2017 8:57 AM, David Jones wrote:
I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option
to put the missing scores in 72_scores.cf into the
On 10/15/2017 04:19 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
Hi Keven
I will tell you in the many months we’ve been using the EBL SA Plug in,
we have yet to see a FP, and thus have raised its initial SA scoring of
1 up to 5 and then again presently to 9. The EBL has been wildly
successful for us at catching
On 10/15/2017 5:19 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
I will tell you in the many months we’ve been using the EBL SA Plug
in, we have yet to see a FP, and thus have raised its initial SA
scoring of 1 up to 5 and then again presently to 9. The EBL has been
wildly successful for us at catching and now blo
