On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
> I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
> masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
> versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to
> put the missing scores in 72_scores.cf into the static 50_scores.cf file
> to keep normal SA scoring levels until the real bug can be found and
> fixed.
I'd prefer a separate file so that we can just delete it when the problem
is understood and fixed.
Good idea. Have a recommendation/preference for the new file name?
72_scores_addendum.cf? 72_scores_fix.cf? 73_scores.cf?
It needs to be processed between 72_scores.cf and 73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf
72_scores_temporary_fix.cf perhaps - let's make explicit that it's a
temporary hack.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberals love sex ed because it teaches kids to be safe around their
sex organs. Conservatives love gun education because it teaches kids
to be safe around guns. However, both believe that the other's
education goals lead to dangers too terrible to contemplate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
200 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
