On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 16:48 -0700, Scott wrote:
>
> >An idea for an alternate collection method: run an imap server on
> your
> >sa-learn training box, setup a second email account in Outlook for
> the
> >users who are training, and have them just drag the ham/spam to
> training
> >folders. I
>An idea for an alternate collection method: run an imap server on your
>sa-learn training box, setup a second email account in Outlook for the
>users who are training, and have them just drag the ham/spam to training
>folders. I don't know if it's "better," but I'd prefer it myself to
>)re)
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 07:55 -0700, Scott wrote:
> I need a way to go from Outlook to train SA if I'm to train at all.
> FOr
> most of my users the inbound mail is handed off to a 3rd party
> Exchange
> server that I don't have access to. So setting up a public IMAP
> folder on
> the exchange serve
tried:
#!/bin/bash
FILES=/home/mail/msg-1502747659-31280-0/*
echo "" > /home/mail/test/out
for f in $FILES
do
echo "Processing $f file..."
# take action on each file. $f store current file name
cat $f|formail >> /home/mail/test.out
done
Almost worked. It adds the needed "From" header and th
On 08/15/2017 12:46 PM, Shivram Krishnan wrote:
Thanks for the response Dianne.
Rule-based systems like spamassassin make room for false positives from
any one of the rules. For instance , a blacklist can have a false
positive, but there may be other rules which may not agree with the
blackli
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:46:59 -0500
Shivram Krishnan wrote:
> Rule-based systems like spamassassin make room for false positives
> from any one of the rules. For instance , a blacklist can have a
> false positive, but there may be other rules which may not agree with
> the blacklist. An ensemble o
Thanks for the response Dianne.
Rule-based systems like spamassassin make room for false positives from any
one of the rules. For instance , a blacklist can have a false positive, but
there may be other rules which may not agree with the blacklist. An
ensemble of such rules allows make spamassassi
Companies with an MBA director who happened to read the "blacklist" buzzword
somewhere and think they will look good by using it themselves.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Shivram Krishnan wrote:
> Thanks for the response Bill. I have got a couple of responses fro
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:02:23 -0500
Shivram Krishnan wrote:
> Thanks for the response Bill. I have got a couple of responses from
> this group, which agree with what you are saying - they have their
> own custom techniques to prevent spam and reduce false positives. If
> thats the case, who uses
Thanks for the response Bill. I have got a couple of responses from this
group, which agree with what you are saying - they have their own custom
techniques to prevent spam and reduce false positives. If thats the case,
who uses third-party generated blacklists?
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:01 PM,
>It should be OK, but it wouldn't be ideal to combine it with=20
>autotraining because the manual training wont be able to counter any=20
>mistraining of the tokens from the stripped headers.=20
> It would probably be a good idea to use a comprehensive ignoreheader=20
> list. You could start with
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:55:39 -0700 (MST)
Scott wrote:
> Hmmm. Doesn't sound good. I sent a simple text message through a
> large ISP, to my server, arrived in a mbox. Compared that message to
> the one that was POPed, then sent back as an attachment and stripped
> out via the existing script.
>
Hmmm. Doesn't sound good. I sent a simple text message through a large ISP,
to my server, arrived in a mbox. Compared that message to the one that was
POPed, then sent back as an attachment and stripped out via the existing
script.
These sanitized messages are pretty short but I put in pastebin
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
On 08/14/2017 05:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
does mysql -u -p localhost spamdb work?
Yes, that works. The user has INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, SELECT privileges.
Does it need CREATE? The table 'txrep' exists with columns username,
email, ip, c
On 8/15/2017 9:22 AM, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
On 08/14/2017 05:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
does mysql -u -p localhost spamdb work?
Yes, that works. The user has INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, SELECT privileges.
Does it need CREATE? The table 'txrep' exists with columns username,
email, ip, co
On 08/14/2017 05:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> does mysql -u -p localhost spamdb work?
Yes, that works. The user has INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, SELECT privileges.
Does it need CREATE? The table 'txrep' exists with columns username,
email, ip, count, totscore, signedby.
The Bayes-related tables r
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:11:14 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 14.08.17 21:34, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >On 2017-08-14 20:08, Scott wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to turn around and put those individual messages back
> >> into mbox format, again, without changing their original headers.
> >
On 14.08.17 21:34, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2017-08-14 20:08, Scott wrote:
I would like to turn around and put those individual messages back
into mbox format, again, without changing their original headers.
The first question is: why? sa-learn works on just about any format:
individual messa
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:08:46 -0700 (MST)
Scott wrote:
> I would like to turn around and put those individual messages back
> into mbox format, again, without changing their original headers.
> Anyone have a script or a method which will accomplish that? I tried
> to figure out how to do it but wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey Alex,
Am 2017-08-06 21:42, Alex schrieb:
>
> Hi all, does anyone know what happened to spamcannibal?
>
I was wondering, too. I noticed a lot of timeouts on our Nameserver regarding
spamcannibal. Anybody an idea what happened?
>
> Perhaps y
> I have a script that can take spam/ham messages forwarded as attachments
> from
> Outlook and turn them into rfc822 individual files. It allows external
> users to send me Outlook spam/ham for review. I will in turn feed
> sa-learn
> with those messages once vetted. That part of the process is
Re. 1: undisclosed
Re. 2: null
Re. 3: not applicable
Re. 4: not applicable
We do not use external blacklists to filter spam.
We use own method, with a ham/spam ratio of 98/02. Spam is not delivered: we
reject it upfront. Our business clients are very happy.
No, we are not protonmail. Protonmail
22 matches
Mail list logo
