>It should be OK, but it wouldn't be ideal to combine it with=20 >autotraining because the manual training wont be able to counter any=20 >mistraining of the tokens from the stripped headers.=20
> It would probably be a good idea to use a comprehensive ignoreheader=20 > list. You could start with AXB's:=20 > = https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_b ayes_ignore_header.cf?view=3Dco Seems like a good place to be able to use a wildcard "X-*" To be sure I understand.... without the ignores, when a message arrives that meets the auto-learn thresholds and is auto-learned, it would be learned WITH the X- headers, right? And the issue might be that I could not be able to over-ride those with one of my manually taught messages that had those X- headers removed. Right? What about the DKIM signatures and Yahoo's X-YMail-OSG signatures? I would not be able to counter those either, should they be ignored as well? -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/message-rfc822-to-mbox-script-for-use-with-sa-learn-workflow-tp138362p138381.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
