On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I stopped
autolearning and hacked up some scripts that put duplicate of each ham
message into a folder which is then processed by sa-learn from a
cronjob, with sufficient delay that I can review the contents and remove
any false negatives; and similarly w
On 2017-08-08 15:20, Scott wrote:
> Another new one big score, auto-learn disabled. This one is fairly small.
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.428 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.4
> tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076, DCC_CHECK=3.2,
> DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
> FILL_THIS_FORM=0.001, FROM_
Another new one big score, auto-learn disabled. This one is fairly small.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.428 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.4
tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076, DCC_CHECK=3.2,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
FILL_THIS_FORM=0.001, FROM_MISSPACED=0.001, FROM_MISSP_SPF_FAIL=1,
On 08/08/2017 02:32 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> subj might concern infra staff
>
> forward please to infra
>
URIBL_BLOCKED means that the URIBL refused your DNS query:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
The name "apache.org" isn't blacklisted, and there's nothing apache can
do to fix it. You nee
>you need to train your bayes *by hand* to start with - how do you expect
>bayes classification with no hints afetr purge the database - train 200
>ham and spam mails and *after that* look further
Reindl:
Thanks. I want to use some auto-training with very conservative thresholds
set. All of th
I was getting my commands missed up, been looking at this too long. When I
ran
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D 2>&1 -t onespam'
That caused it to LEARN the spam. Database went from not there to one
learned. Auto-learn apparently. That's what it should have done when it
arrived.
Brand new spam
Benny:
re tflags
> tflags foo-rule-name noautolearn
> and you can force autolearn based on rulename
> https://lists.gt.net/spamassassin/users/184996
> there is a long thread there that explain it more
>and all condition must be met for learning
I read the thread. Nothing there concrete enough fo
Cleared the database, ran below on the same message:
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D 2>&1 -t onespam' | less
I didn't see any errors obvious to me.
It recreated the databases and added this message as expected.
I don't know how to tell why it would not have auto-learned.
Can you tell/ teach
Scott skrev den 2017-08-08 22:19:
Does this one have the requisite 3-point match? I don't understand how
to
tell yet.
spamassassin -D 2>&1 -t mail.msg | less
should show why
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:16 -0700 (MST)
Scott wrote:
> The "3 points" criteria does not apply to manually learning
No it's just a sanity check to reduce mistraining. If you can, don't
use autotraining at all.
Apologies, I meant sa-learn. Brain fart.
Thanks for the clarification on the 3-point rule.
I've had a bunch of them come through. They all get autolearn=no or I get a
few that say "unavailable" like the sample below. I gather from trying to
figure out myself that unavailable may be things alre
Scott skrev den 2017-08-08 22:06:
Better, what test flags in general disable auto-learn?
tflags foo-rule-name noautolearn
and you can force autolearn based on rulename
https://lists.gt.net/spamassassin/users/184996
there is a long thread there that explain it more
and all condition must be
Scott skrev den 2017-08-08 22:04:
The "3 points" criteria does not apply to manually learning via
sa-update
then?
typo ?. sa-update does not learn, it just update rules, you meant
sa-learn ?
when sa-learn is used, its not autolearn, so the limits are not appled
> some of the listed tags have tflags that disable autolearn
< there is nothing to fix here
Benny: Will you elaborate for me please? So I can understand and
self-help.
Better, what test flags in general disable auto-learn?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.na
The "3 points" criteria does not apply to manually learning via sa-update
then?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-auto-learn-not-happening-tp138065p138071.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 8/8/2017 2:32 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
subj might concern infra staff
forward please to infra
Thanks. Can you give more details? I just sent a test message from my
kmcgr...@apache.org and don't see an issue. Is there a specific RBL?
Return-Path:
Received: from mail.apache.org (herm
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:06:26 -0500
Scott Techlist wrote:
> Centos7
> Postfix 3.2.2
> Amavisd-new 2.11.0
> Spamassassin 3.4.0
> Site-wide configuration
>
> This is a new box and I've configured some conservative values for
> auto-learn. I've enabled it properly AFAIK, but I can't see any sign
> of
subj might concern infra staff
forward please to infra
Scott Techlist skrev den 2017-08-08 20:06:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 17.374
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.374 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.31
tests=[RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.644, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.284, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.558
Centos7
Postfix 3.2.2
Amavisd-new 2.11.0
Spamassassin 3.4.0
Site-wide configuration
This is a new box and I've configured some conservative values for auto-learn.
I've enabled it properly AFAIK, but I can't see any sign of it working.
I have these set in local.cf
use_bayes 1
bay
Dianne Skoll skrev den 2017-08-08 20:09:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 20:01:52 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
why does the OP need to tell sendgrid his users passwords ?
That is indeed a very good question. :)
+1
It's not as if this is some sort of mass-mailing or marketing-oriented
email that needs
On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 20:01:52 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> why does the OP need to tell sendgrid his users passwords ?
That is indeed a very good question. :)
It's not as if this is some sort of mass-mailing or marketing-oriented
email that needs to be tracked.
Regards,
Dianne.
Dianne Skoll skrev den 2017-08-08 15:05:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:00:04 -0500
David Jones wrote:
I absolutely agree but it's possible that this part is out of his
control. Sendgrid might be receiving a plain text email from the
normal source and adding HTML to get that image in there for
trackin
It did. At first I couldn't figure out why it was HTML because the software
was sending plain text message. When I realized it was sendgrid tracing
method that was converting the messages to HTML in order to embed the img
tag so I turned off the tracing.
-Original Message-
From: Dianne S
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:00:04 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> I absolutely agree but it's possible that this part is out of his
> control. Sendgrid might be receiving a plain text email from the
> normal source and adding HTML to get that image in there for
> tracking.
If you can't determine the cont
On 08/08/2017 07:43 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 07:36:01 -0500
David Jones wrote:
The origin of the email and the path it takes makes a big difference
in how it's filtered.
Sure, but doing a plain-text message with no HTML will immediately knock
2.2 points off the score. That
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 07:36:01 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> The origin of the email and the path it takes makes a big difference
> in how it's filtered.
Sure, but doing a plain-text message with no HTML will immediately knock
2.2 points off the score. That's a pretty cheap and easy win.
Regards,
D
On 08/07/2017 07:36 PM, Jacek Osuchowski wrote:
David,
Thanks a lot. I will try to modify the email text to have more 'meat on the
bone'. I am just surprised email with no links, no adds, no attempts to sell
anything can be interpreted as a spam.
That img in the email is a tag from SendGrid emai
Required score -20 on inbound scanning to protect outbound spam?
Op MSG was dkim signed and valid au, why was it not ADD to whitelist auth,
maybe i was sleeping :(
29 matches
Mail list logo
