...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Andy Balholm wrote:
What do you mean?
On 26.05.16 13:37, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
Hi,
I use SpamAssassin-3.4.1p2 on OpenBSD 5.9.
I also use sauserprefs plugin (v1.15-git) in Roundcube 1.1.4.
I have a database 'mail' with the table 'userpref'.
Through the sauserprefs, i can fill the userpref table.
Below a sample :
| username | preference | value |
On Thu, 26 May 2016, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:50 schrieb RW:
I noticed that Bayes is picking-up on very strong tokens from "eval" and
"code" in headers like this:
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1013:global.php(1938) : eval()'d code
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:50 schrieb RW:
I noticed that Bayes is picking-up on very strong tokens from "eval" and
"code" in headers like this:
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1013:global.php(1938) : eval()'d code
The "eval()'d code" part is in just ov
Yes, I eventually discovered -a in the help text. But it’s not in the man page.
I sent a mail to the spamass-milt mailing list (and the maintainers) first, and
got no response. It was the first post to that list since September 2014.
Andy
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:50 schrieb RW:
I noticed that Bayes is picking-up on very strong tokens from "eval" and
"code" in headers like this:
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1013:global.php(1938) : eval()'d code
The "eval()'d code" part is in just over 2% of my spam, but it's
never occurred in a s
Am 26.05.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Andy Balholm:
I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has
happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been
responded to.
The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented o
I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has
happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been
responded to.
The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented on
the man page. If it looked like the project w
Am 26.05.2016 um 23:12 schrieb Andy Balholm:
Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt
Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22
guess from where the Fedora main
Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt
Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22.
Andy
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:37 schrieb sha...@shanew.net:
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is
that four(?) SA headers are kept, but ever
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:50 schrieb RW:
I noticed that Bayes is picking-up on very strong tokens from "eval" and
"code" in headers like this:
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1013:global.php(1938) : eval()'d code
The "eval()'d code" part is in just over 2% of my spam, but it's
never occurred in a s
I noticed that Bayes is picking-up on very strong tokens from "eval" and
"code" in headers like this:
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1013:global.php(1938) : eval()'d code
The "eval()'d code" part is in just over 2% of my spam, but it's
never occurred in a single ham in my corpus.
The spams see
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is
that four(?) SA headers are kept, but everything else is discarded.
I've wanted something like
> ...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates
What do you mean?
Andy
On 26.05.16 10:53, Andy Balholm wrote:
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the
de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or
Postfix, but it is woefully under-maintained. (The security problem
mentioned on https://
On 26/05/2016 13:19, Nick Howitt wrote:
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while back -
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the de-facto
standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or Postfix, but it is
woefully under-maintained. (The security problem mentioned on
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Integrate
On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:20:35 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
you apparently mistook razor to DCC, the DCC is here to measure
bulkiness, but not (necessarily) spamminess.
On 26.05.16 09:46, Dianne Skoll wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Thanks for the clarification!
And also, just to clarify
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
> > DEEP HEADER Inspection -
>
>
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, RW wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
DEEP HEADER Inspection -
This looks like a simple mistake rather than a deliberate attemp
On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:20:35 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> you apparently mistook razor to DCC, the DCC is here to measure
> bulkiness, but not (necessarily) spamminess.
Yes, you are correct. Thanks for the clarification!
And also, just to clarify another thing: Lossy procedures are no
Am 26.05.2016 um 14:19 schrieb Nick Howitt:
I'm finding it hard here. I am using preconfigured distro where Postfix,
amavis and SA are all supplied as a working set up as is dnsmasq. There
is no expectation that the users need to "go under the hood" to fix or
change things. In my case I've tink
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while back - message size.
In Amavis it look as if the
Am 26.05.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 2016-05-26 10:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
I try
lol - so you don't see the message you compose before hit "send"?
but I use multiple machines an
On 2016-05-26 10:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
I try, but I use multiple machines and don't always remember which I've
set explicitly to use plain text. In theory I've set up something in the
share
how often where you asked to stop post HTML mails?
and yes, rules are made by people asked for help
Am 26.05.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and ju
27 matches
Mail list logo
