On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:20:35 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> you apparently mistook razor to DCC, the DCC is here to measure > bulkiness, but not (necessarily) spamminess. Yes, you are correct. Thanks for the clarification! And also, just to clarify another thing: Lossy procedures are not always bad. SpamAssassin rules, for example, are by definition lossy but are quite effective. However, in my experience, manipulating the data you feed into Bayes is rarely helpful and sometimes counterproductive, because Bayes on its own is very good at picking out what's important and what is not. Regards, Dianne.
