On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:27:08AM +0100, Benning, Markus wrote:
> On 2016-02-05 16:25, Henrik K wrote:
> >You should start using the bundled Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/TinyRedis.pm
> >instead of cpan Redis module..
>
> I didn't notice theres a Redis module included with SpamAssassin.
> It seems like
On 2016-02-05 16:25, Henrik K wrote:
You should start using the bundled Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/TinyRedis.pm
instead of cpan Redis module..
I didn't notice theres a Redis module included with SpamAssassin.
It seems like the module is undocumented.
What does the SA Redis module different from th
Thanks folks. As they are cosmetic, I'll worry about them later...
I now know how to fix it up though, so it wont take long.
I'll also check rule update is going on.
thanks
-
From my iPhone.
> On 8 Feb 2016, at 6:18 pm, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
they should be part of the rules itself and i don't understand why rule
writes don't run "-D --lint" regulary *before* publish
I
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Robert Chalmers wrote:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
Feb 8 17:44:07.199 [15545] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule DUP_SUSP_HDR
Feb 8 17:44:07.205 [15545] dbg: config: warning: no description set for
STOX_AND_PR
Am 08.02.2016 um 19:06 schrieb Bill Cole:
You *COULD* add descriptions for rules with missing descriptions in
local.cf, but why bother?
well, because looking for warnings because local modifications is much
easier when the stock install don't produce them at all
signature.asc
Description
Am 08.02.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
they should be part of the rules itself and i don't understand why rule
writes don't run "-D --lint" regulary *before* publish
"describe RULNE_NAME description" in local.c
On 8 Feb 2016, at 12:58, Robert Chalmers wrote:
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D
—lint
Feb 8 17:44:07.199 [15545] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule DUP_SUSP_HDR
Feb 8 17:44:07.205 [15545] dbg: config: warning: no description set
for STOX
I have quite a list of these in the output from spam assassin -D —lint
Feb 8 17:44:07.199 [15545] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule DUP_SUSP_HDR
Feb 8 17:44:07.205 [15545] dbg: config: warning: no description set for
STOX_AND_PRICE
Feb 8 17:44:07.206 [15545] dbg: config:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Robert Chalmers wrote:
That and other options I see for spamassassin at
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
"Again, use the "-D" flag to SpamAssassin, and you will see the score that is used
to determine whether or not autolearning will be triggered
That and other options I see for spamassassin at
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
"Again, use the "-D" flag to SpamAssassin, and you will see the score that is
used to determine whether or not autolearning will be triggered"
Where do I apply this?
I have spamassassin
Am 08.02.2016 um 11:20 schrieb Axb:
On 02/08/2016 11:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that's for sure not a inline image, besides that the description about
gif is wrong
--050005010207060207070405
Content-Type: image/png;
name="scan-eml.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-
On 02/08/2016 11:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that's for sure not a inline image, besides that the description about
gif is wrong
--050005010207060207070405
Content-Type: image/png;
name="scan-eml.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="sc
that's for sure not a inline image, besides that the description about
gif is wrong
--050005010207060207070405
Content-Type: image/png;
name="scan-eml.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="scan-eml.png"
iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAAmgAAAIQCA
14 matches
Mail list logo
