Am 08.02.2016 um 11:20 schrieb Axb:
On 02/08/2016 11:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that's for sure not a inline image, besides that the description about
gif is wrong

--------------050005010207060207070405
Content-Type: image/png;
  name="scan-eml.png"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
  filename="scan-eml.png"

iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAmgAAAIQCAIAAAC6/AWyAAAAA3NCSVQICAjb4U/gAAAACXBI
WXMAAA7EAAAOxAGVKw4bAAAgAElEQVR4nOzdd1wT5xsA8OdCAgkh7A2ykS04mC5QERy4bcWF
C7V11VarVm1ra121dVZx1f2rWrdWrSjuvTeKAiIIyJ45su73x2FEuByJYIH2+X7y+ZC8ecfz
vvcmb+5yOYjXr9IAIYQQQurhNHQACCGEUFPCVSeTTCbLzc3Nzy8oKS0Ri8UymQwAuFyuQCAQ


Commit Modified /sa/trunk/rules/20_imageinfo.cf
Committed revision 1729124

thanks!

i guess the other both was triggered as meta, that was a mail sent by me yesterday with a URL and "should now work from your IP" followed by a iptables-rule and my normal mail signature and a screenshot attached

DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT     Possible Image-only spam with little text
DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML     Possible Image-only spam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to