>looks not so, just 16 hits the last two days and given that we host a
>lot of domains including subdomains all over the world i guess that
>would be more visible
And once the www.alfordmedia.com A record was removed from the SBL the
URIBL_SBL hits stopped. So it seems that even though the descrip
Am 03.09.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Understood. I was under the impression, --username parameter of
sa-learn only pertains mysql. Is this correct?
yes, but exactly the same happens when you use "bayes_path" or call
"sa-learn" with the user for which you train and since you never
I guessing there must be a a byes/spamassassin portal out there. The idea
is for each user to identify spam messages. If so, which would you
recommend?
Thanks in advance
Understood. I was under the impression, --username parameter of sa-learn
only pertains mysql. Is this correct?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.09.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> > I reconfigured spamassassin to use mysql. Now, it seems to be working.
> >
Am 03.09.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 12:28 +0200, Axb wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance
but wouldn't a key:value server like Redis do the trick?
It can't get much faster than that.. ok.. maybe memcached
Yes, I don't see why not: I hadn't considered Redis
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 12:28 +0200, Axb wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance
>
> but wouldn't a key:value server like Redis do the trick?
> It can't get much faster than that.. ok.. maybe memcached
>
Yes, I don't see why not: I hadn't considered Redis because I thought
that, like the Berkeley D
Am 03.09.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
I reconfigured spamassassin to use mysql. Now, it seems to be working.
With every email, of the same type, learned for spam, the score is being
bumped up
well, that's not because mysql, as explained multiple times you need to
train the same baye
On 09/03/2015 12:18 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 11:15 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Oh well, I will give a look at URIDNSBL and see whether/how I can
change
it.
Implementing a simple lookup server using a hashtable of a B-tree can
be very good performance, even from a singl
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 11:15 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Oh well, I will give a look at URIDNSBL and see whether/how I can
> change
> it.
>
Implementing a simple lookup server using a hashtable of a B-tree can
be very good performance, even from a single-threaded local server.
Back in 2000 I h
Am 03.09.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 02.09.15 17:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
[harry@mail-gw:~]$ cat maillog | grep URIBL_SBL | wc -l
16
wow
what about "grep -c URIBL_SBL maillog"?
http://porkmail.org/era/unix/award.html
who cares in a one-shot command over a 30 MB file?
On 02.09.15 17:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
[harry@mail-gw:~]$ cat maillog | grep URIBL_SBL | wc -l
16
wow
what about "grep -c URIBL_SBL maillog"?
http://porkmail.org/era/unix/award.html
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail
11 matches
Mail list logo