need_tags

Hi , i try to understand this http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SpamAssassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm need_tags ... Currently the only tag that needs to be explicitly requested is 'TIMING' ... the goal would be to have time stats of every rule matching in logs, without advanced debug levels on p

The query to URIBL was blocked

Seeing this in most of the markups 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: spa

dkim invalid and 3.4.1

Is there any reason reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error" to fail t_dkim_invalid 1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1,

Re: The query to URIBL was blocked

On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 21:04 -0500, Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 02:01 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote: > > Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else. > > So everywhere I have 192.168.0.1 change it to just read 127.0.0.1. I'll > do that, thanks. That appears to hav

Re: The query to URIBL was blocked

On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 02:01 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote: > Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else. So everywhere I have 192.168.0.1 change it to just read 127.0.0.1. I'll do that, thanks. > -- > Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs > Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile - 850

Re: The query to URIBL was blocked

Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else. -- Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile - 850-890-2543 Fax - 850-254-2955 | Toll Free - 877-699-FLUX Web - http://www.fluxlabs.net On May 2, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Chris mailto:

The query to URIBL was blocked

Seeing this in most of the markups 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block I installed Bind9 as a caching name server and AFAICT it's ru

Re: SA 3.4.1 - error messages in log?

The line for URILocalBL is commented out - I had not enabled it. On May 2, 2015 7:08:10 PM Mark Martinec wrote: On 2015-05-02 14:39, Art Greenberg wrote: > I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in > maillog that I've not seen before. Do they indicate an issue with m

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug)

On 1 May 2015, at 14:34, Forrest wrote: Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with this error: Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug)

On 2015-05-01 20:34, Forrest wrote: Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with this error: Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986. I've seen this befor

Re: SA 3.4.1 - error messages in log?

On 2015-05-02 14:39, Art Greenberg wrote: I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in maillog that I've not seen before. Do they indicate an issue with my installation? Here is a segment from the log. This pattern repeats each time SA processes a message. The use of uninit

Re: Particularly annoying spam

On 2015-05-02 15:40, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote: On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has an FP rate that's negligible

Re: Particularly annoying spam

On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote: On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has an FP rate that's negligible compared with the FP rate of spamassassin

Re: Particularly annoying spam

On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD > > This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. > > Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. > > X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing t

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug) (downgrade fixed)

Am 01.05.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Forrest: Downgrading to 3.4.0 fixed the problem. So, this is definitely a bug. Just not certain where it is yet. I don't have time to go digging at the moment. Anyone else have this? jesus christ provide informations about your environemt http://www.catb.org

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug)

Am 01.05.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Forrest: Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with this error: Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug) (downgrade fixed)

Downgrading to 3.4.0 fixed the problem. So, this is definitely a bug. Just not certain where it is yet. I don't have time to go digging at the moment. Anyone else have this?

Re: Particularly annoying spam

Am 01.05.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Rosenman: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. On 01.05.15 17:11, Reindl Harald wrote: Content analysis details: (14.9 points, 5.5 required) pts rule

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug)

Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with this error: Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986. [

Testing 123...

Test of the list. Regards, KAM

SA 3.4.1 - error messages in log?

I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in maillog that I've not seen before. Do they indicate an issue with my installation? Here is a segment from the log. This pattern repeats each time SA processes a message. The use of uninitialized value and copy_config timeout ar

Re: Particularly annoying spam

Am 01.05.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also a good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training. I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score 5

Re: Particularly annoying spam

On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also a good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training. I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score 5.0 is standard 1.7 points for URIBL_BLACK and standard 3.5