Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread J.J. Day
>> On Apr 30, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >> On 4/30/2015 1:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> Can you add this block of code above line 1386 in the current TxRep.pm? >> Then we'll try and figure out how to enable the TxRep debug channel from MD >> so you can log the info and

ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available

2015-04-30 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On behalf of the project, I am pleased to announce the release of Apache SpamAssassin v3.4.1. Downloads are available at http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi regards, KAM Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.4.1 Introduction Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 repre

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/30/2015 1:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Can you add this block of code above line 1386 in the current TxRep.pm? Then we'll try and figure out how to enable the TxRep debug channel from MD so you can log the info and relay it. It also should hide the informat Can you try this in your mil

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/30/2015 11:44 AM, J.J. Day wrote: FWIW, I switched to TxRep several months ago. Every message generates both error lines. I have added a test to initialize $msgscore to avoid filling my log files. Spam messages seem to all generate a negative offset of ~1/3 the total. I copied a sample to

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread J.J. Day
FWIW, I switched to TxRep several months ago. Every message generates both error lines. I have added a test to initialize $msgscore to avoid filling my log files. Spam messages seem to all generate a negative offset of ~1/3 the total. I copied a sample to the end. My setup is: FreeBSD 10.0 Send

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.04.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Benny Pedersen: Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2015-04-30 12:55: no, it's the "dig" command that does the trace, not the nameserver. This says nothing about your nameserver configuration, and it can't since nameserver does not provide that info. dig respects

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/30/2015 9:56 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Spamassassin called through amavisd as a content filter in postfix. I just see, if I send an emtpy mail (just the subject is "test") through my server, fire the warning. The mail is sent as an authenticated user, in amavis I have special policy bank f

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2015-04-30 12:55: no, it's the "dig" command that does the trace, not the nameserver. This says nothing about your nameserver configuration, and it can't since nameserver does not provide that info. dig respects resolv.conf with nameserver 127.0.0.1 try it :

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-04-30 04:35: Finally that makes sense. I will add the forwarding in as per the documentation. remove forwarding is safe, only use forward dns on zones you self build or have rsync access to

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-04-30 04:14: Actually, looking for this config I can't seem to find it. My spamassassin is linked in with qmail using qmail-scanner-queue.pl. That script looks in /home/qscand/.spamassassin/user_prefs but I also have configs in /etc/mail/spamassassin. What am I lookin

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Dave Pooser
On 4/30/15, 5:55 AM, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote: >no, it's the "dig" command that does the trace, not the nameserver. >This says nothing about your nameserver configuration, and it can't since >nameserver does not provide that info. I stand corrected-- I had tested on another machine that us

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Birta Levente
On 30/04/2015 16:35, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 9:22 AM, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 9:10 AM, Birta Levente wrote: On 30/04/2015 15:55, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 7:09 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Joe Quinn
On 4/30/2015 9:22 AM, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 9:10 AM, Birta Levente wrote: On 30/04/2015 15:55, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 7:09 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/vend

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Joe Quinn
On 4/30/2015 9:10 AM, Birta Levente wrote: On 30/04/2015 15:55, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 7:09 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.p

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Birta Levente
On 30/04/2015 15:55, Joe Quinn wrote: On 4/30/2015 7:09 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm line 1415. _WARN: Use of uninitialized v

Re: TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Joe Quinn
On 4/30/2015 7:09 AM, Birta Levente wrote: Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm line 1415. _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in subtraction (-) I ju

TxRep $msgscore warning

2015-04-30 Thread Birta Levente
Hi I saw the bug report about TxRep warning: _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm line 1415. _WARN: Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in subtraction (-) I just wonder if there is any workaroung for tha

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30/04/15 09:56, Marieke Janssen wrote: 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more informa

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.04.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 4/30/15, 12:16 AM, "Tom Robinson" wrote: BTW, where can I see the results of my configuration changes? It would be nice to confirm that my changes have rectified the situation. On 30.04.15 01:38, Dave Pooser wrote: On the server (via

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread David Jones
>On the server (via SSH or console) use the +trace argument to dig, and >then look for lines starting with ';;': >postmstr@smtp:~$ dig +trace example.com.multi.uribl.com | grep ';;' >;; global options: +cmd >;; Received 913 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 8 ms >;; Received 760 bytes from 199

Re: AWL defeating my SPAM classification

2015-04-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 4/30/15, 12:16 AM, "Tom Robinson" wrote: BTW, where can I see the results of my configuration changes? It would be nice to confirm that my changes have rectified the situation. On 30.04.15 01:38, Dave Pooser wrote: On the server (via SSH or console) use the +trace argument to dig, and then