On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.11.2014 um 23:27 schrieb John Hardin:
However, it is a *warning*, not a fatal error. And it's better than the
rule killing lint and blocking sa-update completely on an install that
uses an older perl
don't get me wrong but this *warning* trig
Am 29.11.2014 um 23:27 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 29. nov. 2014 17.14.44 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
It is a Spamassassin code change to try and limit rules that require a
specific version of perl.
Upgraded here to latest trunk version of sa, there
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 29. nov. 2014 17.14.44 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
It is a Spamassassin code change to try and limit rules that require a
specific version of perl.
Upgraded here to latest trunk version of sa, there is it working as designed,
but on older 3.4.1
On 29. nov. 2014 17.14.44 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
It is a Spamassassin code change to try and limit rules that require a
specific version of perl.
Regards,
Upgraded here to latest trunk version of sa, there is it working as
designed, but on older 3.4.1, 3.4.0, 3.3.2 it fails
Hello John,
Saturday, November 29, 2014, 6:21:01 PM, you wrote:
JH> This is just a warning.
I guessed given that the bayes lesrning carried on after.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpRIalU5b7H9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Niamh Holding wrote:
Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
sa-learn --dump magic
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 530) line 2.
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 1023) line 2.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/
It is a Spamassassin code change to try and limit rules that require a specific
version of perl.
Regards,
KAM
On November 29, 2014 9:53:16 AM EST, Martin Gregorie
wrote:
>On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 15:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.11.2014 um 15:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
>> > There w
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 15:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.11.2014 um 15:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> > There were changes made but I had a feeling they might not be backwards
> > compatible. Will look at changing that to a has/can function but leave
> > the new perl version code for futu
Am 29.11.2014 um 15:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
There were changes made but I had a feeling they might not be backwards
compatible. Will look at changing that to a has/can function but leave
the new perl version code for future use.
that hapens also with a recent perl-5.18 while the old rule
There were changes made but I had a feeling they might not be backwards
compatible. Will look at changing that to a has/can function but leave the new
perl version code for future use.
Regards,
KAM
On November 29, 2014 6:32:15 AM EST, Martin wrote:
>
>I seem to have found the problems in 72ac
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 10:25 +, Niamh Holding wrote:
> Hello
>
> Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
>
Yes, but with 3.3.2, not 3.4.0.
Last night was the first time I've ever seen it. It was displayed by the
sa_update cron job.
Martin
I seem to have found the problems in 72active.cf
if perl_version >= 5.01
metaPDS_FROM_2_EMAILS __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS && !__VIA_ML &&
!__VIA_RESIGNER
endif
And
if perl_version >= 5.01
header __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS From =~
/^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:ma...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 10:58 AM
To: 'Niamh Holding'
Subject: RE: Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric
> -Original Message-
> From: Niamh Holding [mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, November 29,
Am 29.11.2014 um 11:39 schrieb Jim Popovitch:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello
Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
sa-learn --dump magic
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 530) line 2.
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
>
> sa-learn --dump magic
> Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 530) line 2.
> Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 1023) line
> 2.
Last
Hello
Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
sa-learn --dump magic
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 530) line 2.
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 1023) line 2.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.0
16 matches
Mail list logo
