Re: Honeypot email addresses

Le 26/11/2014 19:56, Christian Grunfeld a écrit : even /64 DNSxLs will be expensive ! /64 lists will have 2^32 times more entries than IPv4 lists. /64 lists can *theoretically* have that many entries, yes, but it'll be a very long time before there are 2^32 times as many *allocated* IPv6 /64s

Re: unsubscribe

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 26.11.2014 um 23:44 schrieb Nick Edwards: google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully google does not lie, or hide. did you pure asshole ever consider that i

Re: [SA-Users] Re: unsubscribe

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 26 November 2014 at 21:05:30 (EU time), John Hardin wrote: > > > Moderator, I am making an official request to ban Nick Edwards > > for abuse. There is no call for and no excuse > > for such behavior. > > From just an "

Re: unsubscribe

Holy crap. You're adults, this is a professional list. Start acting like adults and if you want to continue this pissing match, take this off list. You're cluttering my inbox, and this is beyond rude to those on the list. For being anti-spam it sure feels like I'm being sent some right now. On Nov

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 23:54 schrieb Nick Edwards: all people have to do is google you, then they will know the truth about what nasty bit of work you really are and how you attack people all the time, that and all those list bannings and moderations should make them realize who they are really deal

Re: unsubscribe

On Wednesday 26 November 2014 at 23:44:10 (EU time), Nick Edwards wrote: > google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not > dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully > google does not lie, or hide. We don't care. This list is for SpamAssassin discussion

Re: unsubscribe

all people have to do is google you, then they will know the truth about what nasty bit of work you really are and how you attack people all the time, that and all those list bannings and moderations should make them realize who they are really dealing with. On 11/27/14, Reindl Harald wrote: >

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 23:44 schrieb Nick Edwards: google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully google does not lie, or hide. did you pure asshole ever consider that i try to do my best to be more nice as been i

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 23:42 schrieb Nick Edwards: On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote: fedora list MODERATED not true for many months oh because you "allegedly" unsubscribed bullshit - fedora devel active all the time https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-November/thread.html

Re: unsubscribe

On Wednesday 26 November 2014 at 21:05:30 (EU time), John Hardin wrote: > Moderator, I am making an official request to ban Nick Edwards > for abuse. There is no call for and no excuse > for such behavior. From just an "average member" of this list, seconded. He's even continuing, despite both

Re: unsubscribe

google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully google does not lie, or hide. On 11/27/14, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Anthony Cartmell wrote: > >>> How about you take your own advice. On any of my

Re: unsubscribe

On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > fedora list MODERATED >>> >>> not true for many months >>> >> oh because you "allegedly" unsubscribed > > bullshit - fedora devel active all the time > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-November/thread.html > dont mix words reindl im

Re: unsubscribe

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Anthony Cartmell wrote: How about you take your own advice. On any of my lists that diatribe would get you banned no questions asked. I'm always amused by the abusive language people sometimes use on this list. Bad language, and personal attacks, reveal a lot more about t

Re: unsubscribe

On 11/26/2014 07:54 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:06 PM +0100 Axb wrote: Girls, ^ -> Extremely sexist. Please try some other form of insult in the future. ;) blame my education or lack of.. 8-P

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello John, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 4:56:46 PM, you wrote: JH> Any possibility of upgrading to at least perl 5.10.0? Not officially on CentOS 5.11 it seems as nothing newer is listed- Bummer. Well, the rule is commented out in my sandbox. Ho

Re: Honeypot email addresses

even /64 DNSxLs will be expensive ! /64 lists will have 2^32 times more entries than IPv4 lists. 2014-11-26 15:45 GMT-03:00 Franck Martin : > > On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Franck Martin > wrote: > > >> As for /64, yes there are h

Re: unsubscribe

--On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:06 PM +0100 Axb wrote: Girls, ^ -> Extremely sexist. Please try some other form of insult in the future. ;) --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Server Architect Zimbra, Inc. Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and

Re: Honeypot email addresses

Am 26.11.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Franck Martin: On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Matthias Leisi mailto:matth...@leisi.net>> wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Franck Martin mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com>> wrote: As for /64, yes there are hosting providers that have all their customers i

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Matthias Leisi mailto:matth...@leisi.net>> wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Franck Martin mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com>> wrote: As for /64, yes there are hosting providers that have all their customers in the same /64 and other cases like this where infra

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > As for /64, yes there are hosting providers that have all their customers > in the same /64 and other cases like this where infrastructure is not > separated by /64 boundaries. I think IPv6 blocking list will be more last > resort, than fir

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

Hello John, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 4:56:46 PM, you wrote: JH> Any possibility of upgrading to at least perl 5.10.0? Not officially on CentOS 5.11 it seems as nothing newer is listed- yum list perl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * b

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Kevin A. McGrail mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com>> wrote: On 11/26/2014 1:53 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Franck Martin mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com>> wrote: You may want to read https://www.m3aawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/M3AAWG_Inbound_I

Re: could not create IO::Socket::IP socket on [127.0.0.1]:783: Address already in use

> Thanks, that explains how we get to 'Address already in use'. > > This opens up a couple of questions: > > - creating a socket listening on '::' apparently does work > (it is tested in the BEGIN phase, and reported by 'have PF_INET6'), > but creating a socket listening on '::1' (i.e. a loopback

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On 11/26/2014 11:58 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 11/26/2014 11:27 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On 11/26/2014 11:56 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Burnie wrote: Seems one of the new rules fails to lint. Perhaps there's a mismatch with the regexp and perl 5.8? spamassassin 3.3.1 perl 5.8.8 # /usr/bin/sa-update config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: /^\W+([\w+

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Burnie wrote: Seems one of the new rules fails to lint. Perhaps there's a mismatch with the regexp and perl 5.8? spamassassin 3.3.1 perl 5.8.8 # /usr/bin/sa-update config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 11/26/2014 11:27 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i:

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On 11/26/2014 11:27 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i: B> Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by <-- HERE

Re: unsubscribe

I will contribute one post to this thread. http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=14124117308&w=2 Just saying. Regards, David.

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

Not getting the lint error here.. Perl 5.14.2 On 26/11/14 16:37, Axb wrote: On 11/26/2014 05:27 PM, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

On 11/26/2014 05:27 PM, Niamh Holding wrote: Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i: B> Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by <-- HERE

Re: sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

Hello Burnie, Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: B> config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: B> /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i: B> Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by <-- HERE in B> m/(?i)^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++

Re: unsubscribe

How about you take your own advice. On any of my lists that diatribe would get you banned no questions asked. I'm always amused by the abusive language people sometimes use on this list. Bad language, and personal attacks, reveal a lot more about the person doing the writing than the pers

Re: Honeypot email addresses

Am 26.11.2014 um 15:07 schrieb David F. Skoll: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:10:04 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: the unbound stats on our inbound MX saying the opposite How much of those are DNSBL lookups against DNSBLs with short TTLs? below the stats by RBL and keep in mind postscreen always asks

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:10:04 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > the unbound stats on our inbound MX saying the opposite How much of those are DNSBL lookups against DNSBLs with short TTLs? Regards, David.

Re: Honeypot email addresses

Am 26.11.2014 um 14:06 schrieb David F. Skoll: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 07:53:20 +0100 Matthias Leisi wrote: Yes, such an approach might initially double the amount of queries and has an increased risk of not getting DNS responses, but on the other hand such "tree information" can be nicely cached

Re: unsubscribe

Girls, Please take your feud offlist. It's totally offtopic Thank you

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 07:53:20 +0100 Matthias Leisi wrote: > Yes, such an approach might initially double the amount of queries > and has an increased risk of not getting DNS responses, but on the > other hand such "tree information" can be nicely cached with > reasonably long TTLs, even for the fa

Re: unsubscribe

How about you take your own advice. On any of my lists that diatribe would get you banned no questions asked. On November 26, 2014 7:19:15 AM EST, Nick Edwards wrote: >how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just >fuck off to your own hole you troll every list you join

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 13:46 schrieb Nick Edwards: On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 26.11.2014 um 13:30 schrieb Nick Edwards: my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like acid to them it is my aum in l

Re: unsubscribe

On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 26.11.2014 um 13:30 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where >> not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like >> acid to them it is my aum in life to rid the internet of scum like yo

Re: Facebook subdomain spamming started today

its quite painstaking but I reluctantly agree with Reindl, if you are going to post crap like this, post details On 11/23/14, Benny Pedersen wrote: > No more info in public from me

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 13:30 schrieb Nick Edwards: my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like acid to them it is my aum in life to rid the internet of scum like you there was nothing abusive in my response

Re: unsubscribe

my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like acid to them it is my aum in life to rid the internet of scum like you centos list BANNED fedora list MODERATED roundcube list MODERATED dovecot list FINAL WARNI

Re: unsubscribe

Am 26.11.2014 um 13:19 schrieb Nick Edwards: how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just fuck off to your own hole you troll every list you join you act like god but your nothing but an offensive troll nobody what is your problem? i got even a off-list thank you mail

Re: unsubscribe

how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just fuck off to your own hole you troll every list you join you act like god but your nothing but an offensive troll nobody On 11/25/14, Reindl Harald wrote: > * don't hijack threads > * don't send "unsubscribe" to the whole list

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

On 11/26/14, Paul Gardiner wrote: > On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: >>> I drive spamassassin using spampd. >>> >>> I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken >>> me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two c

sa-update lint fail on __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS

Seems one of the new rules fails to lint. Perhaps there's a mismatch with the regexp and perl 5.8? spamassassin 3.3.1 perl 5.8.8 # /usr/bin/sa-update config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS: /^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i: Nested quantifiers

Re: Honeypot email addresses

On 11/26/2014 1:53 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Franck Martin > wrote: You may want to read https://www.m3aawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/M3AAWG_Inbound_IPv6_Policy_Issues-2014-09.pdf I'm well aware of the issues of cache ef