On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Burnie wrote:
Seems one of the new rules fails to lint.
Perhaps there's a mismatch with the regexp and perl 5.8?
spamassassin 3.3.1
perl 5.8.8
# /usr/bin/sa-update
config: invalid regexp for rule __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS:
/^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i:
Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by <-- HERE in
m/(?i)^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++ <-- HERE
)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/
channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed
Whoops. The ++ syntax was introduced in perl 5.10
Since there's no way to add a perl version exclusion to that rule I've
commented it out, but I don't know how quickly it will go out. Any
possibility of upgrading to at least perl 5.10.0?
You could try editing your local 72_active.cf to remove the two
PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rules (subrule and meta):
# header __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS From =~
/^\W+([\w+.-]+\@[\w.-]+\.\w\w++)(?:[^\n\w<]{0,80})?<(?!\1)[^\n\s]*\@/i
# meta PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS && !__VIA_ML &&
!__VIA_RESIGNER
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
-- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
29 days until Christmas
