Two things, are you using
1) "amavis" (OLD original)
2) "amavis-new"
3) "amavis-ng"
If "amavis-new" are you managing -its- config files, NOT 'spamd's config files?
Please look at the docs for "amavis-new", it instanciates its own SA instance
within its perl damon, it does not use 'spamd'.
If you
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Less obviously, it doesn't seem to matter whether you write the rule
as /\.link\b/ or /\.link$/ - both give identical matches. Both match
the following regexes just as you'd expect:
http: //www.linkedin.com
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Less obviously, it doesn't seem to matter whether you write the rule
as /\.link\b/ or /\.link$/ - both give identical matches. Both match
the following regexes just as you'd expect:
http://www.linkedin.com/home/user/data.link
http://www.example.li
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:27 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > . Does \b match end of string? That
> > never occurred to me. I've always used $ to do that and it certainly
> > works as part of a URI rule.
>
> No, \b matches the transition from a word
On October 25, 2014 2:30:32 AM John Hardin wrote:
>>uri __MG_LTD1 /(\.link$|\.link\/)/i
> There is still a match on unancored match, remove |\.link\/ and ()
...leaving /\.link$/i ?
You only want to match on a URL that is solely a bare domain in the .link
TLD?
Its a subrule for
Anyone have any ideas??
-Original Message-
From: dave
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:51 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> SA Mailing list
Subject: RE: rules and configuration not running correctly
(Sorry about the list thing realized after sending) It is launched from amavis
--
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On October 24, 2014 9:20:14 PM Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
uri __MG_LTD1 /(\.link$|\.link\/)/i
There is still a match on unancored match, remove |\.link\/ and ()
...leaving /\.link$/i ?
You only want to match on a URL that is solel
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 19:48 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
If it does it's behaving oddly. Still, I might try this instead:
uri __MG_LTD1 /\.link\b/i
That should be faster and more general than the second one above, and
shouldn't grab lin
On October 24, 2014 9:20:14 PM Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
uri __MG_LTD1 /(\.link$|\.link\/)/i
There is still a match on unancored match, remove |\.link\/ and ()
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 19:48 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
> If it does it's behaving oddly. Still, I might try this instead:
>
> uri __MG_LTD1 /\.link\b/i
>
> That should be faster and more general than the second one above, and
> shouldn't grab linkedin either.
>
The problem is that
--As of October 25, 2014 12:45:31 AM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to
have said:
Am 25.10.2014 um 00:42 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:31:51 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
Am 25.10.2014 um 00:42 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:31:51 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
Thanks for that. I've now installed it and have been running tests
against my spam cor
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:31:51 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.10.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> > --On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
> >> Thanks for that. I've now installed it and have been running tests
> >> against my spam corpus to make sure th
micah anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically send
> mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy stuff in
> them, because they are mail server logs, or web logs with some spammy
> stuff in them.
>
> I don't want spamass
Am 24.10.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
Thanks for that. I've now installed it and have been running tests
against my spam corpus to make sure that this subrule:
uri __MG_LTD1 /\.link/i
was now working corr
Am 24.10.2014 um 21:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 17:59 schrieb micah anderson:
I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically
send
mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy
stuff in
them, becau
--On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:56 PM +0100 Martin Gregorie
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 17:20 +0200, Axb wrote:
As there's a bunch of other new TLDs being abused I would higly recomend
updating RegistrarBoundaries.pm
from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAs
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 17:59 schrieb micah anderson:
I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically send
mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy stuff in
them, because they are mail server logs, or web logs with
(Sorry about the list thing realized after sending)
It is launched from amavis
-Original Message-
From: Axb [mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: rules and configuration not running correctly
Still no go ... I just sent this to myself--X-virus gets added X-Spam does not
Received: from mailgate.example.org (x.x.x.1) by exchangeserver.example.org
(x.x.x.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.438.0; Fri, 24 Oct 2014
11:38:31 -0500
Received: from localhost (mailgate.example.org [127.0.0.1
On 10/24/2014 06:34 PM, dave wrote:
Thanks... I am looking to have x-spam status and associated scores
added to the headers of all messages ... also my custom and sought
rules do not seem to fire
Please keep list mail on the list.
- How are you using SA?
(pls specify: amavis, MIMEDefang, a
On 10/24/2014 06:17 PM, dave wrote:
Hello all
I am running Spamassassin 3.4 on an Ubuntu 14.04 build. The server installation
is working as a spam\ email Gateway. It does not host mail at all, but simply
forwards email to exchange server. It serves pretty much as a prefilter for
exchange.
Th
Hello all
I am running Spamassassin 3.4 on an Ubuntu 14.04 build. The server installation
is working as a spam\ email Gateway. It does not host mail at all, but simply
forwards email to exchange server. It serves pretty much as a prefilter for
exchange.
The problem with them having is that I c
On 10/24/2014 05:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
Hi,
I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically send
mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy stuff in
them, because they are mail server logs, or web logs with some spammy
stuff in them.
I don't want
Am 24.10.2014 um 17:59 schrieb micah anderson:
I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically send
mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy stuff in
them, because they are mail server logs, or web logs with some spammy
stuff in them.
I don't want spam
Hi,
I've got some machines that are running logcheck, they periodically send
mail to us with reports. Sometimes those mails have some spammy stuff in
them, because they are mail server logs, or web logs with some spammy
stuff in them.
I don't want spamassassin to deal with these messages, I wan
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 14:12 +0100, Paul Stead wrote:
> Being UK based we get a lot of email from these connections.
>
In the past I've received a lot of 'commercial messages', IOW spam by
another name, that claimed to be from BT and probably was although it
came from apparently unrelated UK-based
Am 24.10.2014 um 15:23 schrieb Paul Stead:
Was more curious as to the general thoughts on this, whilst I don't deal
directly with the support tickets, I wouldn't wish that situation on
anyone.
On 24/10/14 14:16, Axb wrote:
Considering Zen's size I wouldn't do it unless you want to generate
you
Was more curious as to the general thoughts on this, whilst I don't deal
directly with the support tickets, I wouldn't wish that situation on anyone.
On 24/10/14 14:16, Axb wrote:
Considering Zen's size I wouldn't do it unless you want to generate
yourself a huge amount of support tickets.
On
Am 24.10.2014 um 15:12 schrieb Paul Stead:
Being UK based we get a lot of email from these connections.
I've just done a quick check and we get a lot of (seemingly) legit email
from servers with generic BT PTRs - how wide spread is rejecting email
based upon generic PTR rules?
don't know how
On 10/24/2014 9:12 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Being UK based we get a lot of email from these connections.
Agreed. Tell BT to put up something on www.btconnect.com that redirects
to let silly Americans know that it's a real company...
I've just done a quick check and we get a lot of (seemingly) le
On 10/24/2014 03:12 PM, Paul Stead wrote:
Being UK based we get a lot of email from these connections.
I've just done a quick check and we get a lot of (seemingly) legit email
from servers with generic BT PTRs - how wide spread is rejecting email
based upon generic PTR rules?
Considering Zen's
Being UK based we get a lot of email from these connections.
I've just done a quick check and we get a lot of (seemingly) legit email from
servers with generic BT PTRs - how wide spread is rejecting email based upon
generic PTR rules?
Paul
On 24/10/14 13:52, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.10.201
On 10/24/2014 8:43 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
...I would recommend Email::Filter instead.
Definitely will try it out! Thanks.
Am 24.10.2014 um 14:34 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 10/24/2014 7:25 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Not sure if this is a legit listing, however it's causing problems for
some of my user base.
I've added btconnect.com to my uridnsbl_skip_domain list
Nothing legit came up when we were spot-checking the domain
On 10/24/2014 7:25 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Not sure if this is a legit listing, however it's causing problems for
some of my user base.
I've added btconnect.com to my uridnsbl_skip_domain list
Paul
--
*Paul Stead*
Systems Engineer
*Zen Internet*
Nothing legit came up when we were spot-checking t
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:00:29 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> Procmail has some weird syntax
Procmail is also unmaintained abandonware, as far as I can tell.
If you use SpamAssassin, you probably like Perl, so I would recommend
Email::Filter instead. It's far more flexible than procmail and le
On 10/24/2014 7:25 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Not sure if this is a legit listing, however it's causing problems for
some of my user base.
I've added btconnect.com to my uridnsbl_skip_domain list
Paul
--
*Paul Stead*
Systems Engineer
*Zen Internet*
Looks like it's compromised accounts on a place ca
Not sure if this is a legit listing, however it's causing problems for some of
my user base.
I've added btconnect.com to my uridnsbl_skip_domain list
Paul
--
Paul Stead
Systems Engineer
Zen Internet
> -Original Message-
> From: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> [mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:03 AM
> To: sah62
> Subject: Re: SpamCop Not Reporting
>
> On 2014-10-23 22:40, sah62 wrote:
> > I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 with Perl version 5
40 matches
Mail list logo
