Thanks - I'll try to install it.
On 10/15/14 12:38, Timo Schöler wrote:
Am 15. Oktober 2014 19:10:28 MESZ, schrieb Marc Perkel
:
I'm thinking about trying out SA 3.4.0 on Centos 6 or 7 if I have to.
Just wondering - is it worth it? And is Redis available and how hard is
it to actually make it
On 10/15/2014 7:33 PM, Ken Bass wrote:
On 10/15/2014 6:50 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I'd have to dig into it to find out more but there are different
modules used for different tests so deviation in behavior is not
something that alarms me. If you replace your RegistrarBoundaries.pm
and it s
On 10/15/2014 6:50 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I'd have to dig into it to find out more but there are different
modules used for different tests so deviation in behavior is not
something that alarms me. If you replace your RegistrarBoundaries.pm
and it still has issues, please let us know. I a
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 18:20 -0400, Ken Bass wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 6:12 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > I'm certain KAM is right and here's why.
> ...snip...
> > IOW, uri rules depend on matching the terminal part of the domain name
> > with an entry in SA's built-in TLD list and my version, install
On 10/15/2014 6:20 PM, Ken Bass wrote:
On 10/15/2014 6:12 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
I'm certain KAM is right and here's why.
...snip...
IOW, uri rules depend on matching the terminal part of the domain name
with an entry in SA's built-in TLD list and my version, installed from
the Fedora repo
On 10/15/2014 6:12 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
I'm certain KAM is right and here's why.
...snip...
IOW, uri rules depend on matching the terminal part of the domain name
with an entry in SA's built-in TLD list and my version, installed from
the Fedora repo, doesn't yet include .link.
I reverted
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 17:01 -0400, Ken Bass wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 4:52 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > On 10/15/2014 4:49 PM, Ken Bass wrote:
> >> 1) My local.cf has a rule to address the new .link domain which
> >> spammers appear to be using recently:
> >>
> >> uri LR_LINK_TLD /^(?:https?:\/\/|
On 10/15/2014 4:52 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The TLDs are hardcoded in SA 3.3.2. We are working on not having
them hard-coded in 3.4.1.
I found Bug 6782, which I think you are referring to. I don't quite
understand the details of it. But are saying that the 'uri' and uridnsbl
rules
rely on
On 10/15/2014 4:52 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/15/2014 4:49 PM, Ken Bass wrote:
1) My local.cf has a rule to address the new .link domain which
spammers appear to be using recently:
uri LR_LINK_TLD /^(?:https?:\/\/|mailto:)[^\/]+\.link(?:\/|$)/i
describe LR_LINK_TLD Contains a URL in th
On 10/15/2014 4:49 PM, Ken Bass wrote:
I'm using Centos 7, which means SA version 3.3.2.
I am encountering several emails that are not being processed
correctly when checking against URI rules.
1) My local.cf has a rule to address the new .link domain which
spammers appear to be using recent
I'm using Centos 7, which means SA version 3.3.2.
I am encountering several emails that are not being processed correctly
when checking against URI rules.
1) My local.cf has a rule to address the new .link domain which spammers
appear to be using recently:
uri LR_LINK_TLD /^(?:https?:\/\/|m
Am 15. Oktober 2014 19:10:28 MESZ, schrieb Marc Perkel
:
>I'm thinking about trying out SA 3.4.0 on Centos 6 or 7 if I have to.
>Just wondering - is it worth it? And is Redis available and how hard is
>
>it to actually make it work?
Wrt redis, yes, it is and it's really easy to set up, even in r
On 2014-10-15 10:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/15/2014 1:07 PM, Derek Harding wrote:
On 9/25/14, 2:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
irrelevant - every list has a welcome message and there is no logic
in ask other members to unsubscribe yourself, one did also not ask
them for subscribe
https://
On 10/15/2014 1:07 PM, Derek Harding wrote:
On 9/25/14, 2:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
irrelevant - every list has a welcome message and there is no logic
in ask other members to unsubscribe yourself, one did also not ask
them for subscribe
https://www.google.at/search?q=spamassassin+mailing+li
I'm thinking about trying out SA 3.4.0 on Centos 6 or 7 if I have to.
Just wondering - is it worth it? And is Redis available and how hard is
it to actually make it work?
Thanks in advance
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filt
Am 15.10.2014 um 19:07 schrieb Derek Harding:
On 9/25/14, 2:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
irrelevant - every list has a welcome message and there is no logic in
ask other members to unsubscribe yourself, one did also not ask them
for subscribe https://www.google.at/search?q=spamassassin+mailing+l
On 9/25/14, 2:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
irrelevant - every list has a welcome message and there is no logic in
ask other members to unsubscribe yourself, one did also not ask them
for subscribe https://www.google.at/search?q=spamassassin+mailing+list
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Maili
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:54:56 +0200
Axb wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 05:07 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
> > Axb wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
> >>> Axb wrote:
> >>>
>
> have you verified that some of these are
On 10/15/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:19 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
I propose to simplify, and move the code-wise exclusion to a config file
too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
Besides, the config file is far easier to read for th
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:12 +0200, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a new server with CentOS release 6.5
> I manually compile:
> - clamav-0.98.4
> - Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0.tar.gz
> - milter-greylist-4.4.3.tgz
> - mimedefang-2.75.tar.gz
> - sendmail.8.14.9.tar.gz
>
> The service wor
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:19 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> I propose to simplify, and move the code-wise exclusion to a config file
> too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
> Besides, the config file is far easier to read for the not so
> regex-capable admin :)
>
That so
Hi all,
I have a new server with CentOS release 6.5
I manually compile:
- clamav-0.98.4
- Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0.tar.gz
- milter-greylist-4.4.3.tgz
- mimedefang-2.75.tar.gz
- sendmail.8.14.9.tar.gz
The service work fine, but I spamassassin doesn't work!
I don't use it as a demon, it shoul be
On 10/15/2014 10:54 AM, Anthony Cartmell wrote:
ok..
now here's a suprise (it's all in the code :)
the Bayes.pm plugin alreafy includes:
# Spamfilter/virus-scanner headers: too easy to chain from
# these
|X-MailScanner(?:-SpamCheck)?
For some time now MailScanner has r
ok..
now here's a suprise (it's all in the code :)
the Bayes.pm plugin alreafy includes:
# Spamfilter/virus-scanner headers: too easy to chain from
# these
|X-MailScanner(?:-SpamCheck)?
For some time now MailScanner has recommended that users modify the
MailScanner he
On 10/14/2014 11:54 PM, Axb wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 05:07 PM, RW wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:27 +0200
>> Axb wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/14/2014 01:51 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:51 +0200
Axb wrote:
>
> have you verified that some of these are not included?
>
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
