On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 18:20 -0400, Ken Bass wrote: > On 10/15/2014 6:12 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > I'm certain KAM is right and here's why. > ...snip... > > IOW, uri rules depend on matching the terminal part of the domain name > > with an entry in SA's built-in TLD list and my version, installed from > > the Fedora repo, doesn't yet include .link. > > > > I reverted my rules and test messages to test for the .link TLD and am > > now waiting for a TLD list that contains .link to percolate through the > > Fedora update process. > > > > > I think my confusion is that for many spam messages, the uri rule is > working fine for the .link domain. > After looking at some different spam emails, I think the difference is > that if the .link is inside an 'HTML' spam, the url processing works. If > it is a normal text spam email, the url processing does not work. That > has been the source of my confusion and why I was thinking KAM was > referring to a different issue. > > So I am thinking that the HTML decoding part of SA doesn't use that > built-in TLD list, but the test email processing does. That is the only > way I can explain it what I am seeing. > That's quite possible. My test messages are all plaintext or have the uris in plaintext MIME parts.
Martin
