On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> I ran sa-update & sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
I have a crontab entry:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart
should I add an sa-compile call?
--
'It's still a lie. Like the
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 16:37 -0700, Dave Warren wrote:
> If you're paranoid, you can monitor the DNSBLs that you use via script
> (externally from SpamAssassin) and generate something that reports to
> you when there's a possible issue. If you're really paranoid, you can
> have it write a .cf tha
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 01:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.10.2014 um 00:49 schrieb Eric Cunningham:
> > Is there a way to configure URIBL_RHS_DOB conditionally such that if
> > there are issues with dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net like we're
> > seeing, that associated scoring remains neut
On 2014-10-07 16:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
what happens here is unintentional and so you can't say if the
response is wrong - if you would know the answer you would not ask the
server
If you're paranoid, you can monitor the DNSBLs that you use via script
(externally from SpamAssassin) and gen
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:49 -0400, Eric Cunningham wrote:
> Is there a way to configure URIBL_RHS_DOB conditionally such that if
> there are issues with dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net like we're
> seeing, that associated scoring remains neutral rather than increasing
> (or decreasing)?
No. A
Am 08.10.2014 um 00:49 schrieb Eric Cunningham:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 6, 2014 6:39:21 PM Eric Cunningham wrote:
Hello, has anyone else experienced an HUGE uptick in the number of
rejected legitimate emails following an sa-update run over this past
And sp
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 6, 2014 6:39:21 PM Eric Cunningham wrote:
Hello, has anyone else experienced an HUGE uptick in the number of
rejected legitimate emails following an sa-update run over this past
And spammassin only tags mail, it does not reject, so st
Please welcome Muhmademad back to his daily spam run... .-)
Kevin A. McGrail:
We are working on solutions expected for the 3.4.1 release on ~9/30.
are the any updates on the release plan?
Am 07.10.2014 um 20:12 schrieb Mark Martinec:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody comment in what context null-senders and
so bounces and probably autorepsonders are blocked
by "DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST"
DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN is checking a domain in a
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody comment in what context null-senders and
so bounces and probably autorepsonders are blocked
by "DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST"
DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN is checking a domain in a From header field,
not the envelope sender addr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7.10.2014 20:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson:
>> On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debi
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson:
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
>>
>> root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
>> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
>
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
>
> root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
> timed out without signaling production of a PID fil
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:15 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody comment in what context null-senders and
so bounces and probably autorepsonders are blocked
by "DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST"
SA does not block. *sigh*
pure SA, y
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> can somebody comment in what context null-senders and
> so bounces and probably autorepsonders are blocked
> by "DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST"
SA does not block. *sigh*
In this context, the DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN hit is irrelevant, giv
Am 04.10.2014 um 15:27 schrieb Axb:
On 10/04/2014 03:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I removed from /trunk/rules and dumped in my sandbox till dev team gives
its +1 for addition ot SA ruleset
atm, you can find it
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore
On 7.10.2014 18:58, Axb wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
>>
>> root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
>> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
>> timed out without signali
On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at
/usr
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 2960.
real0m1.230s
use
can somebody comment in what context null-senders and
so bounces and probably autorepsonders are blocked
by "DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST"
DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,USER_IN_BLACKLIST
from=<> to=
3jC2XD1j8Cz1y: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE
a customer sends out his yearly members-invitation nad
On 10/07/2014 01:12 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/07/2014 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Axb:
On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone else seeing an unusually high hit count tod
On 10/07/2014 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Axb:
On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone else seeing an unusually high hit count today for
URIBL_RHS_DOB?
>
>
host go
Am 07.10.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Axb:
On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone else seeing an unusually high hit count today for URIBL_RHS_DOB?
>
>
host google.com.dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net
Hos
On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone else seeing an unusually high hit count today for URIBL_RHS_DOB?
>
>
host google.com.dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net
Host google.com.dob.sibl.support-intellig
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone else seeing an unusually high hit count today for URIBL_RHS_DOB?
>
>
host google.com.dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net
Host google.com.dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
"web tools"
27 matches
Mail list logo
