Re: recent channel update woes

[Reindl Harald]

Am 08.10.2014 um 00:49 schrieb Eric Cunningham:

Am 06.10.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Benny Pedersen:

On October 6, 2014 6:39:21 PM Eric Cunningham <e...@whoi.edu> wrote:

Hello, has anyone else experienced an HUGE uptick in the number of
rejected legitimate emails following an sa-update run over this past

And spammassin only tags mail, it does not reject, so stop saying it an
sa issue when its not

on a sane setup it is part of a milter and rejects above a specific
level because it makes little sense to accept high score spam and only
move it in a different folder

frankly 3 weeks ago we had about 30000 junk attemps per day and now we
have the same per week - guess why - because delayes, postscreen and
reject highscore spam instead sign "250 OK" to the bot client

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.2, tag-level=4.5, block-level=8.0

Is there a way to configure URIBL_RHS_DOB conditionally such that if
there are issues with dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net like we're
seeing, that associated scoring remains neutral rather than increasing
(or decreasing)?

not really - if you get the response from the DNS - well, you are done

the only exception are dnslists which stop to answer if you excedd the free limit but in that case they answer with a different response what is caught by the rules what happens here is unintentional and so you can't say if the response is wrong - if you would know the answer you would not ask the server

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature