On 10/02/2014 08:50 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 03436572 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 01475976 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0
...continuing, sorry for multiple replies...
On 02.10.14 14:10, Jason Haar wrote:
However, it's been 7 hours since I sent my first email and now the same
message is BAYES_20 - so it is "learning" something - just took longer
than I was used to I guess. We use site-wide SA and don't really
hand-f
On 02/10/14 10:17, Axb wrote:
have you tried "-L forget" before "-L spam" ?
sa-learn --dump magic before and after learning show show a
difference...
On 02.10.14 14:10, Jason Haar wrote:
I didn't do a "forget" before - I'll remember that, thanks.
This is not usually needed. Axb recommended
On 10/02/2014 03:10 AM, Jason Haar wrote:
On 02/10/14 10:17, Axb wrote:
have you tried "-L forget" before "-L spam" ?
sa-learn --dump magic before and after learning show show a
difference...
I didn't do a "forget" before - I'll remember that, thanks. As far as
"before, after" goes for the
On 02/10/14 10:17, Axb wrote:
>
> have you tried "-L forget" before "-L spam" ?
>
> sa-learn --dump magic before and after learning show show a
> difference...
I didn't do a "forget" before - I'll remember that, thanks. As far as
"before, after" goes for the dump - not an option. We're receiving
On 10/01/2014 06:39 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
We're using SA-3.4.0 with REDIS for bayes and until now what I've
normally seen is that if a piece of spam got through and got (say)
BAYES_00, then I could throw it back in via "spamc -L spam" and
immediately see it jump up to BAYES_50
Well tod
Am 01.10.2014 um 18:39 schrieb Jason Haar:
> We're using SA-3.4.0 with REDIS for bayes and until now what I've
> normally seen is that if a piece of spam got through and got (say)
> BAYES_00, then I could throw it back in via "spamc -L spam" and
> immediately see it jump up to BAYES_50
>
> Well t
Hi there
We're using SA-3.4.0 with REDIS for bayes and until now what I've
normally seen is that if a piece of spam got through and got (say)
BAYES_00, then I could throw it back in via "spamc -L spam" and
immediately see it jump up to BAYES_50
Well today I threw in such an email, "spamc -L spam"
Am 01.10.2014 um 17:11 schrieb LuKreme:
> On 30 Sep 2014, at 15:14 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>> nevermind - *.tld just works
>> misunderstood the documentation
>>
>> BLOCKED: t...@crap.domain.tld.local
>> FINE:t...@crap.domain.tld.local.com
>
> Did you put this in local.cf or user_prefs?
local
On 30 Sep 2014, at 15:14 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> nevermind - *.tld just works
> misunderstood the documentation
>
> BLOCKED: t...@crap.domain.tld.local
> FINE:t...@crap.domain.tld.local.com
Did you put this in local.cf or user_prefs?
--
From deep inside the tears that I'm forced to cry Fr
Hello,
I had the idea to run my own updateserver for two purposes:
1. distribute own rules
2. override existing rules
But somehow I fail on #2.
SA rules normally reside in /var/.../spamassassin/$SA-VERSION/channelname/*.cf
Also the are files /var/.../spamassassin/$SA-VERSION/channelname.cf
Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
reply - they lea
12 matches
Mail list logo
