...continuing, sorry for multiple replies... On 02.10.14 14:10, Jason Haar wrote:
However, it's been 7 hours since I sent my first email and now the same message is BAYES_20 - so it is "learning" something - just took longer than I was used to I guess. We use site-wide SA and don't really hand-feed the bayes (too hard for our users: Exchange backends, SA frontend), so there is over 200% more nspam tokens than nham - could that cause a problem?
that could cause false positives, but should not cause false negatives.
sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 3436572 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 1475976 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: oldest atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: newest atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count
this looks like you have no tokens at all. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages." "That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."
