> I'm now running it on two production systems and have been monitoring it
> for quite a while. So far so good! We have some more work we want to
> do to roll out 3.4.0. If you are interested in knowing more or helping,
> please chime in on the dev list.
>
> Files for this release candidate
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:08:54PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
>>> Looks
On 10/13/2013 5:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
install the rule
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
> Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
> install the ruleset you need.
>
> regards,
> KAM
On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
install the ruleset you need.
regards,
KAM
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> Thanks for trying the releas
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> Thanks for trying the releas
On 10/13/2013 11:07 AM, John Hardin wrote:
...
> Yes. It will take a day or two to make it through masscheck. And we've
> had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham corpus gets
> thin again updates may be delayed.
FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2
3am CDT w/score 2.8
11am CDT w/score 2.4
Upd
On 10/13/2013 2:17 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
> And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if
the ham > corpus gets thin again updates may be delaye
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
> And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham
> corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I
On Sunday 13 October 2013 15:17:40 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a package perl-IO-Socket-IP available from
> any repo.
On Debian (and raspbian) it's called libio-socket-ip-perl,
on FreeBSD it is net/p5-IO-Socket-IP. Don't know about others.
> I don't know where the program fetc
On 10/13/2013 9:17 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I've just tested building 3.4.0 on Centos 5 system where I also built
3.3.2. make and make test worked fine. I'm not sure if I can make it an
inplace replacement, though. Has anyone running MailScanner tried 3.4.0?
So, I haven't installed it yet.
I don'
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the
ham corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I don't know how quickly this
change will go out, sorry.
On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
the start up message as expected.
Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
Any ideas?
Thanks for trying the release candidate. I'll be happy to try and help
but need more information.
What does
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham
corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I don't know how quickly this change
will go out, sorry.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/12/2013 9:28 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Steve, the one who wrote this regex, would you please explain your
reasoning behind giving this rule a score so high as 2.8,
That score was auto-assigned by masschec
seems to be working on the test system.
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 225071157F.A48D0 to
3B69711588
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 22356114B9.A4C8E to
015801157F
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Uninfected: Delivered 2 messages
Oct 13 15:56:31 news
what is "the startup message as expected"? MailScanner message?
Does it lint correctly (MS)?
I've just built an rpm and installed it on a test system. So far it looks
good, but I have to send some mail to it now as this system normally
doesn't get mail.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Inter
I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
the start up message as expected.
Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
Any ideas?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
I've just tested building 3.4.0 on Centos 5 system where I also built
3.3.2. make and make test worked fine. I'm not sure if I can make it an
inplace replacement, though. Has anyone running MailScanner tried 3.4.0?
So, I haven't installed it yet.
Observations:
I'm missing a spec file. Earlier v
On 10/12/2013 9:28 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Steve, the one who wrote this regex, would you please explain your
>> reasoning behind giving this rule a score so high as 2.8,
>
> That score was auto-assigned by masscheck, where it is doing quite well:
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
