On Mon, July 29, 2013 10:21 am, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> There were none for this email.
>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Whoops. I missed those... I guess this could be why a 7-bit copy/paste
wouldn't work, and using the mbox file directly is required.
> Trie
--On Monday, July 29, 2013 10:19 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-07-29 21:50:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=9.734 tagged_above=-10 required=3
WHITELISTED
No matter how much I feed these emails to SA for training as spam,
the user
its not whitelisted in sa, its a
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:50:51 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Running SA 3.4.0 from April 1st, 2013. I'm seeing an issue where
> obvious spam is reporting as whitelisted from SA for some users. We
> do not have per-user whitelisting, so it seems AWL as for some
> unknown and bizarre reason, de
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev den 2013-07-29 21:50:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=9.734 tagged_above=-10 required=3
WHITELISTED
No matter how much I feed these emails to SA for training as spam,
the user
its not whitelisted in sa, its amavisd
dont blame sa for this :)
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:30:40 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 18:21 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Tried --forget without the To header?
>
> Seeing that empty Subject header, instead of completely removing the
> To header it might also be an empty header ("To: " wit
Running SA 3.4.0 from April 1st, 2013. I'm seeing an issue where obvious
spam is reporting as whitelisted from SA for some users. We do not have
per-user whitelisting, so it seems AWL as for some unknown and bizarre
reason, decided to whitelist this spam. The *same* emails for me get
marked as
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 19:08 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> version=3.3.2
>
> well here bayes score is lower then autolearnthreashhold so it learns
> its self as ham forever
tflags learn (the Bayesian rules) are ignor
Amir 'CG' Caspi skrev den 2013-07-29 18:06:
I'm suspecting that it's the "undisclosed recipients" in the To:
field that may be causing confusion with Bayes... I think the MUA
inserted that, but not entirely positive.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 18:21 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Tried --forget without the To header?
Seeing that empty Subject header, instead of completely removing the To
header it might also be an empty header ("To: " with a trailing space).
Probably before or after the From header, or maybe b
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:06 -0600, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> At 5:48 PM +0200 07/29/2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > See the Content-Type and Content-Transfer-Encoding headers.
>
> There were none for this email.
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> The complete "raw s
At 5:48 PM +0200 07/29/2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I strongly suggest to NEVER copy-n-paste like that, but to either run
sa-learn on an entire mbox, or *save* a single mail to a file. Since
For what it's worth, I also opened the mbox in a
text editor and copied the actual raw message (as
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 09:31 -0600, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> >SA always needs a full, raw message, including all headers, alternative
> >parts, and attachments if any. And in particular regarding the sa-learn
> >message ID, almost every bit counts.
>
> Yes, in this case the message was plain-text,
At 12:00 PM +0200 07/29/2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
You're best bet is to just train what you have as spam, to counter the
Sure, I was planning to do that. The reason I
wanted to --forget it was to make sure that I
wasn't learning it twice (once as ham, once as
spam).
You do not hav
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 23:12 -0600, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> So, some of my FNs get autolearned as ham, and because of the
> way my mail queue is set up, I typically only see this once the mail
> reaches my MUA and has already been deleted from the online inbox. I
> have one particular mes
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:07 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> Then all my updates are failing especially to
> rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com with error access denied.
What is the error you get? Paste the output, we cannot help without you
providing some actual data. sa-update -D output might me interes
15 matches
Mail list logo
