Hi SpamAssassin PMC,
My name is Henry Draper. I'm from Comm100 Network Corporation. We use
SpamAssassin to detect our emails' spam scores.
l how you're invoking SpamAssassin - with default configurations
l what version of SpamAssassin you're using - Version 3.3.2
l your platform. - Windows
Yeah - I'm running global too. Not per user.
On 5/16/2013 5:38 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
One common bayes DB running MySql on one server.
Spa001 running SA and MySQL plus auto learn
Spa010 running SA no auto learn
Spa011 running SA no auto learn
Spa013 running SA with auto learn
All Spas
On 5/16/2013 5:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Running a 4 server cluster of SA servers with MySQL running on one. 2 running
auto learn and the other two just
doing queries. Looks like I average about 6300 queries a minute. No
noticeable problems with it.
So they are all separate from each other,
Hi,
One common bayes DB running MySql on one server.
Spa001 running SA and MySQL plus auto learn
Spa010 running SA no auto learn
Spa011 running SA no auto learn
Spa013 running SA with auto learn
All Spas looking at the MySQL server on Spa001.
Global bayes database btw, not per user as we are an
Hi,
> Running a 4 server cluster of SA servers with MySQL running on one. 2
> running auto learn and the other two just
> doing queries. Looks like I average about 6300 queries a minute. No
> noticeable problems with it.
So they are all separate from each other, not sharing a common bayes db
Hi,
Running a 4 server cluster of SA servers with MySQL running on one. 2 running
auto learn and the other two just doing queries. Looks like I average about
6300 queries a minute. No noticeable problems with it.
Recently looked at Maria but we are in the middle of a move here, would love to
In the past I have never managed to get bayes to work with MySQL in a
reliable way. Even running in ram it would die of some sort of
corruption after a few hours.
Now I'm trying the MariaDB replacement. I will admit I'm running a
faster server than the last time I tried MySQL - but so far so g
On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:24:24 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 14.05.13 20:55, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >As to the letting SA check the origination addresses, my setup looks
> >like this:
> >
> >internal_networks192.168.7/24
> >
> >trusted_networks 192.168.7/24
> >trusted_networks
On 16.05.13 19:32, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
I shall have Bayes forget emails, then retrain with a rule that counts
linkedin invitations as spam. I have one I wrote earlier and implemented
after Bayes had gone off track.
You don't have to forget mail, unless you have feed incorrectly formatted
m
Thank-you everyone.
I shall have Bayes forget emails, then retrain with a rule that counts linkedin
invitations as spam. I have one I wrote earlier and implemented after Bayes had
gone off track.
Cheers, S.
--
as silly as fun
simon@klunky / .co.uk / .org / .net
pgp 4BA78604
Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:07:53 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Simon Loewenthal skrev den 2013-05-16 15:17:
>
> > * have sa-learn exclude references to linkedin?
>
> basicly you need to know how bayes works, it does not just use the
> word linkedin as writed, but more or less split it to each letter
Simon Loewenthal skrev den 2013-05-16 15:17:
* have sa-learn exclude references to linkedin?
basicly you need to know how bayes works, it does not just use the word
linkedin as writed, but more or less split it to each letter, so
linkedin and other content is splited into atoms that being st
On 16.05.13 15:17, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that LinkedIn
invitation emails hit BAYES_00. A bit strange I thought being unlikely
someone had run sa-learn on LinkedIn emails.
I grepped on all the Ham and Spam directories and hit lots of
On 2013-05-16 16:17, RW wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:14 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi all, I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed
that LinkedIn invitation emails hit BAYES_00.
When you say email, I presume you mean spam.
Yep
A bit strange I thought being unl
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:14 +0200
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that
> LinkedIn
> invitation emails hit BAYES_00.
When you say email, I presume you mean spam.
> A bit strange I thought being
> unlikely someone had run sa-
Hi all,
I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that
LinkedIn
invitation emails hit BAYES_00. A bit strange I thought being
unlikely someone had run sa-learn on LinkedIn emails.
I grepped on all the Ham and Spam directories and hit lots of
"linkedin,com" in URLs in the bod
16 matches
Mail list logo