On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:14 +0200 Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Hi all, > > I turned shortcircuit for BAYES_00 on a server, and noticed that > LinkedIn > invitation emails hit BAYES_00.
When you say email, I presume you mean spam. > A bit strange I thought being > unlikely someone had run sa-learn on LinkedIn emails. > > I grepped on all the Ham and Spam directories and hit lots of > "linkedin,com" in URLs in the body, yet no "linkedin.com" entries in > the > headers. The few invitations spams I've received have all hit BAYES_50 or greater, despite my learning a lot of ham with linkedin.com URIs - I'm doubtful that's the sole explanation. > Do you know if sa-learn will count URLs in emails, and put this into > Bayes? Yes it does > > If the answer above is yes, then how could I: Have you tried learning LinkedIn spam as spam? You may not be able to get it to BAYES_99, but it should be possible to get it to BAYES_50. .
