Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem

2013-04-24 Thread Christian Recktenwald
I ran some tests which indicate one may not have subsequent '-' after 'X-' in header lines: given this "message": X-SpamASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16 X-Spam-ASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16 body... and those rules: header _LOCAL_XAS1 X-SpamASN =~ /AS3701 / de

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem - proof

2013-04-24 Thread Frank Gadegast
Hi again, I checked the rule now by inserting a line like ASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16 in the test-msg, modified the asn-rule to header TEST_AS3701 ASN =~ /^AS3701 / describe TEST_AS3701Sender IP in AS from friendly SA user score TEST_AS3701 -0.1 tested, and ... X-Spam-Status: No

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem

2013-04-24 Thread Frank Gadegast
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Frank Gadegast skrev den 2013-04-24 16:45: header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / The ASN plugin documentation [1] shows the AS number at the beginning of the header's value. The leading space prevents your header rule from matching, and should instead eve

Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry

2013-04-24 Thread psychobyte
Well, in the bayes case, the table is bayes_token and indeed Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL is INSERTING into the table via _put_tokens(). my $insertsql = "INSERT INTO bayes_token (id, token, spam_count, ham_count, atime) VALUES (?,?,?,?,?)"; so,

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-04-25 01:04: space needs to be excaped, [...] Just... No. okay no, always good to have more then one input to be sure -- senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 01:04 +0200, /me fat-fingered: > > > header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / > > The ASN plugin documentation [1] shows the AS number at the beginning of > the header's value. The leading space prevents your header rule from > matching, and the RE should instead ev

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
> Frank Gadegast skrev den 2013-04-24 16:45: > > > header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / The ASN plugin documentation [1] shows the AS number at the beginning of the header's value. The leading space prevents your header rule from matching, and should instead even anchor the RE at the

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Benny Pedersen wrote: Frank Gadegast skrev den 2013-04-24 16:45: header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / /\ AS6697\ / or /\bAS6697\b/ -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -

Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
Frank Gadegast skrev den 2013-04-24 16:45: header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / /\ AS6697\ / space needs to be excaped, does it match ? spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msg | grep LOCAL_ | less describe LOCAL_AS6697 Sender IP in AS-block from BELBAK.BY score LOCAL_AS6697 9.0 --

Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry

2013-04-24 Thread Ben Johnson
On 4/24/2013 2:42 PM, psychobyte wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that SA is getting a lot of "Duplicate entry" errors for > AWL and bayes plugins. I can verify that the sql schema is up to date > for SA 3.3.1-r4 and I've tried retraining the bayes db. Any hints on how > to troubleshoot this? > >

Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread Axb
On 04/24/2013 08:16 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote: As far as Bayes, don't get me started! :) I work for an Email Service Provider and about 2 million messages go through our servers every day, so we have Bayes turned off because it would be too computationally expensive. I wish we could turn it on - i

RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote: Hi again, John - It's a good idea to add the realtime rules to the beginning of the filter. I didn't realize that would have such an impact. It will have *some* impact. How much will depend on how many alternates and how complex they are. It might al

Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:32 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote: > I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF > files (by category) and I have those further split up into rules based > on score. > I also use very long rules, mainly due to spamiferous mailing lists, because all the

SQL error: Duplicate entry

2013-04-24 Thread psychobyte
Hi, I've noticed that SA is getting a lot of "Duplicate entry" errors for AWL and bayes plugins. I can verify that the sql schema is up to date for SA 3.3.1-r4 and I've tried retraining the bayes db. Any hints on how to troubleshoot this? AWL: Apr 24 11:31:57 mserv amavisd[24336]: (24336-05

RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hi again, John - It's a good idea to add the realtime rules to the beginning of the filter. I didn't realize that would have such an impact. And the (?=x) tip is a good one too; thank you for that. As far as Bayes, don't get me started! :) I work for an Email Service Provider and about 2 million

RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote: John, Thanks for your prompt response! A lot of the rules are big jumbles of rules we are generating in real time and adding to as things come in. Like I said in my original question, we have them separated into separate cf files by category, and withi

RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread Andrew Talbot
John, Thanks for your prompt response! A lot of the rules are big jumbles of rules we are generating in real time and adding to as things come in. Like I said in my original question, we have them separated into separate cf files by category, and within those cf files they are separated by score

Re: Seminar Spam

2013-04-24 Thread Ben Johnson
On 4/24/2013 12:12 PM, hospice admin wrote: > Hi, > > we're having problems with an outfit called 'Bite Sized Seminars' in the > UK, who seem to be sending mail out through another company called > 'Communicado'. A quick google suggests we aren't the only ones. > > We have developed a number of

Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote: Hey, all - I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF files (by category) and I have those further split up into rules based on score. So, I have a bunch of stuff like: header RULE_1 Subject =~ /\b(this|that|theother|blah|bla

Re: Seminar Spam

2013-04-24 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 17:12 +0100, hospice admin wrote: > we're having problems with an outfit called 'Bite Sized Seminars' in > the UK, who seem to be sending mail out through another company called > 'Communicado'. A quick google suggests we aren't the only ones. > > We have developed a number o

More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?

2013-04-24 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hey, all - I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF files (by category) and I have those further split up into rules based on score. So, I have a bunch of stuff like: header RULE_1 Subject =~ /\b(this|that|theother|blah|blah)/i score RULE_1 1 describe RULE_

Re: Seminar Spam

2013-04-24 Thread Axb
On 04/24/2013 06:12 PM, hospice admin wrote: Hi, we're having problems with an outfit called 'Bite Sized Seminars' in the UK, who seem to be sending mail out through another company called 'Communicado'. A quick google suggests we aren't the only ones. We have developed a number of rules that i

Seminar Spam

2013-04-24 Thread hospice admin
Hi, we're having problems with an outfit called 'Bite Sized Seminars' in the UK, who seem to be sending mail out through another company called 'Communicado'. A quick google suggests we aren't the only ones. We have developed a number of rules that identify their mail by looking for their phone

rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN

2013-04-24 Thread Frank Gadegast
Hi all, I like to set extra score on mail coming from some ASns using the asn.pm Lets say I like to reject all mail from BELPAK.BY I wrote header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 / describe LOCAL_AS6697 Sender IP in AS-block from BELBAK.BY score LOCAL_AS6697 9.0 but the X-Spam-A