On 10/01/13 00:03, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/9/2013 5:36 PM, RW wrote:
This is not better, it indicates that SA didn't recognise it as an
email, not that it recognised it as a spam. Whatever /tmp/msg.txt was
it wasn't a properly formatted email.
Thanks for the quick replies, Marius and RW.
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 1/9/2013 7:36 PM, wolfgang wrote:
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_CSS,RCVD_IN_PSBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,URIBL_DBL_S
PAM, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
I am not familiar with amavis, but I know that it calls spamassassin in
a special way, depen
On 1/9/2013 7:36 PM, wolfgang wrote:
> On 2013-01-10 01:03, Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>> I see; I saved the email message out of Thunderbird (with View ->
>> Headers -> All), as a plain text file. Apparently, that process
>> butchers the original message.
>
> In Thunderbird, rather use File > Save a
On 2013-01-10 01:03, Ben Johnson wrote:
> I see; I saved the email message out of Thunderbird (with View ->
> Headers -> All), as a plain text file. Apparently, that process
> butchers the original message.
In Thunderbird, rather use File > Save as to save the entire message.
> RCVD_IN_BRBL_LAST
On 1/9/2013 5:36 PM, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:14:05 -0500
> Ben Johnson wrote:
>
>> About five months ago, I experienced a problem that I *thought* I had
>> resolved, but I am observing similar behavior after retraining the
>> Bayes database. While the symptoms are similar, the root ca
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:14:05 -0500
Ben Johnson wrote:
> About five months ago, I experienced a problem that I *thought* I had
> resolved, but I am observing similar behavior after retraining the
> Bayes database. While the symptoms are similar, the root cause seems
> to be different (thankfully).
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:14:05PM -0500, Ben Johnson wrote:
> Content analysis details: (7.5 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
> -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message w
About five months ago, I experienced a problem that I *thought* I had
resolved, but I am observing similar behavior after retraining the Bayes
database. While the symptoms are similar, the root cause seems to be
different (thankfully). The original problem is documented at
http://spamassassin.10653
