On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:14:05PM -0500, Ben Johnson wrote: > Content analysis details: (7.5 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP > 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header > 2.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% > [score: 0.5000] > 1.2 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header > 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header > -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers > 1.8 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header > 0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE Message appears to be missing most RFC-822 > headers > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
These hits indicate that the mail you're testing (/tmp/msg.txt) is corrupted, as it is missing most email headers. > In short, my question is, how the **** is the message scoring 0.8 in one > case and 7.5 in another? That is a massive discrepancy. In the second case, the mail you are testing is corrupted. Open /tmp/msg.txt in a text editor and check if it looks sane. -- Marius Gavrilescu (warnings) Do not dangle the mouse by its cable or throw the mouse at co-workers. --From a manual for an SGI computer.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
